"You know we went through this with the stimulus bill, with all of the things that people learned about after they voted," said Rep. Mike Ross (D-AR).

"We just need to slow down and get it right."

Ross pointed us to Section 2002 of the health care bill, "Public Health Investment Fund."

It's pretty straightforward, establishing a new fund to help pay for public health needs at community health centers, the National Health Service Corps program and more.

But then, there is some language that makes people on Capitol Hill stop, shake their head, and re-read what they just read.

"Amounts appropriated under this section, and outlays flowing from such appropriations, shall not be taken into account for purposes of any budget enforcement procedures including allocations under section 302(a) and (b) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act and budget resolutions for fiscal years during which appropriations are made from the Fund," it says under "Budgetary Implications."

Did that just say the money spent under this section shouldn't be counted?

"It's worded in a way to where (the money) is not included when the Congressional Budget Office scores the bill," said Ross, who argues that a delay until after Labor Day would be a good idea.

"Members need a chance to read the bill that they're voting on, to catch more of these things like Section 2002 of the bill," he added.

"That's what the American people are tired of."

One thing I quickly checked when I looked at the health care bill language again was to see if that type of budget language was used anywhere else.

Yes, on page 76, there was another example of where the costs of a certain program would not be "counted" for this bill.

In this case, it was for Section 164, "Reinsurance Program For Retirees," a new "temporary reinsurance program" that's designed to "provide reimbursement to assist participating employment-based plans with the cost of providing health benefits to retirees and to eligible spouses, surviving spouses and dependents of such retirees."

Does that sort of sound to you like the insurance industry would be getting money from the feds to pay out claims for retirees?

It is not an open-ended fund though, as on page 70, it says "the total of all such amounts requested shall not exceed" $10 billion.

At least the taxpayers got that going for them, eh?

Remember, if you want to leaf through the House bill yourself, here is your link http://bit.ly/nSL2A

You never know what you might learn, or what you might find in there.