| Jamie Dupree |
The Baucus Bill
And I mean a thud.
It almost seemed like Baucus was hung out to dry by the White House and fellow Democrats, as he trotted out what he felt were the best options from months of behind the scenes negotiations among six Senators.
He was all by himself, as no one else from that group appeared with him at a news conference, even to offer moral support.
Even the White House had a hard time acting like there was some excitement about the effort.
"The President likes the fact that the process is moving forward," said White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who tried his best to fend off reporters who instinctively knew that he wasn't going to say much positive about the plan at a briefing.
Meanwhile, the AFL-CIO gave the bill a thumbs down. A liberal health reform group expressed its dismay with the proposal.
And then some Democrats who are on Baucus' Senate Finance Committee simply said they would have to vote against it right now.
"The proposed co-op model is untested and unsubstantiated - and should not be considered as a national model for health insurance," said Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV).
Rockefeller hit on one of many issues that Democrats didn't like about the Baucus bill, as more liberal lawmakers say the lack of a public health insurance option is unacceptable.
Over in the House, a group of more liberal Democrats pronounced the Baucus bill "Dead on Arrival."
And these are people in the same party.
It was another reminder that efforts at compromise among Democrats have not been easy and will not be easy in the weeks ahead.
Democrats probably wish that Baucus had put out this proposal several months ago, because they could have moved on and basically ignored it.
Instead, Baucus was able to keep himself at the negotiating table and keep Democratic Leaders and the President at bay.
If the Baucus health reform plan is a "compromise," it may be that it's a compromise with himself.
What others are saying
- The Baucus Bill - Let's tax ourselves to compete with ourselves!Let me understand this...one proposal the Democrats want in this bill (instead of the co-op idea) is that if you don't buy any health insurance, you are taxed (I mean penalized). If you can go on a Public Option (âwhenâ it becomes available), it will compete with those in the private insurance industry which âwhenâ successful, will displace people that are employed in the insurance industry (i.e., make them unemployed), which will then dump more people into unemployment (since the US Government drove their employer out of business) and either have no health care coverage and therefore will be taxed (i.e., penalized) or they can perhaps choose the Pubic Option coverage and become more of a burden on taxpayers -...Hmmm...Should the US Government cause more unemployment through direct competition against the 1,300 existing insurance providers (Communism) or encourage open competition between them (Capitalism)? Well Comrades, what say you?
- The Baucus Bill - Why now - why so fast?Why so fast when bill doesn't become effective until 2013?
Why not approach the simpler fixable problems first, and then proceed to the more difficult ones? Oh, I know, thereâs no power in logic....so whoever is in power - Democrats or Republicans - want to glorify themselves that "they got a bill through that saved the world from itself!"
And these penalties for people who "don't choose health care coverage"...is that Constitutional or more importantly, is it right to do?
Rain likelyHighs: 45 Lows 23-27
5-Day Forecast | Kirk Mellish's weather blog | Local radar image
Marketplace
Shop for cars, find a dealer, and get the latest automotive news in our Local Car Buying Guide powered by AutoTrader.com
From fast food to fine dining, find it all in our Local Business Directory .
Read the AJC and stay on top of everything in Atlanta! Get delivery for less than $2 a week!
Join Channel 2 Action News anchors John Pruitt and Monica Pearson at 5, 6, and 11pm.








