Are you a part of the News/Talk 750 WSB VIP? Sign in or join now. Why join?
Text size: A A A
Kirk Mellish's Weather Commentary

How wet was it?

By
Kirk Mellish
@ November 5, 2009 6:12 AM
Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA
200 PM EDT WED NOV 4 2009

...HISTORICAL RAINFALL FREQUENCY AMOUNTS OCCUR OVER PORTIONS OF
NORTH GEORGIA IN SEPTEMBER 2009...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HAS BEEN REVIEWING THE EXTREME HEAVY
RAINFALL THAT OCCURRED IN SEPTEMBER 2009 WHICH CAUSED EPIC FLOODING
IN PORTIONS OF NORTH GEORGIA. NUMEROUS LOCATIONS IN DOUGLAS...EAST
PAULDING...WEST COBB...EAST CARROLL...CENTRAL GWINNETT AND SOUTHWEST
WALKER COUNTIES EXCEEDED 10 INCHES OF RAIN DURING A 24 HOUR PERIOD.
THE GREATEST AMOUNT WAS 16.7 INCHES JUST WEST OF DOUGLASVILLE.

THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE FOR 24 HOUR RAINFALL FREQUENCY PERIODS IN
NORTH GEORGIA AND THE CHANCES OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...

7.2 INCHES IS 1.0 PERCENT...100 YEAR RAIN EVENT
7.7 INCHES IS 0.5 PERCENT...200 YEAR RAIN EVENT
8.2 INCHES IS 0.2 PERCENT...500 YEAR RAIN EVENT
8.7 INCHES IS 0.1 PERCENT...1000 YEAR RAIN EVENT
9.7 INCHES IS 0.05 PERCENT...5000 YEAR RAIN EVENT

USING RAINFALL FREQUENCY CALCULATIONS...IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THE
CHANCES OF 10 INCHES OR MORE OCCURRING AT ANY GIVEN POINT ARE LESS
THAN ONE HUNDRETH OF ONE PERCENT. THIS MEANS THE ODDS ARE 1 IN 10000
OR MORE OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...OR A 10000 YEAR RAIN EVENT.

WEATHER RADAR ESTIMATES COMBINED WITH AUTOMATED HOURLY RAINGAGE
REPORTS INDICATED THE 24 HOUR PERIOD WITH THE MOST INTENSE RAINFALL
FOR THE WHOLE STORM EVENT WAS FROM 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 20
THROUGH 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 21.

How Wet was this October?

After being in a drought much of the last three years, several sites across north and central Georgia has received some of the highest rainfall in the past month or so. For instance, October 2009 is the second wettest October ever at both Atlanta and Athens. The only October that had more rainfall in Atlanta was 1995 when the remnants of Hurricane Opal moved across the area early in the month bringing more than 8 inches to Atlanta over a three day period. The 2009 year in Athens will be second only to October of 1937 when Athens received 11.23 inches of rain. The following table shows the top ten wettest Octobers at Atlanta, Athens, Columbus and Macon:

Atlanta
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
199511.04
20098.71
19667.53
19597.14
19326.90
19376.30
19706.29
19156.15
19906.12
19146.04
Athens
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
193711.23
20099.14
19188.21
19147.95
19977.75
19647.73
19867.65
19777.41
18987.40
19957.29
Macon
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
19599.39
19158.46
19297.49
19947.36
19707.16
19666.61
20096.37
19936.37
19906.31
19115.96
Columbus
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
19958.41
19648.09
19596.59
20096.39
20085.48
19755.42
19945.41
19765.06
19664.70
19704.47




Looking at rainfall amounts since September 1, Athens and Macon was the wettest 61 day period for September and October on record, while Atlanta was number 2 and Columbus was number 3. It is interesting to note that the rainfall experienced this year is in no way attributable to a landfalling Tropical Storm or Hurricane. A look back through the National Hurricane Center's Archives shows that the remnants of Tropical Storm Irene impacted Columbus October 6-10th, 1959; Hurricane Dora affected Columbus September 9-12, 1964; and the remnants of Hurricane Opal impacted both Columbus and Atlanta October 3-6th, 1995. Unfortunately data on tropical storms in 1888 and 1937 was unavailable.


Atlanta
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
188818.25
200917.65
200415.84
199513.56
198913.35
192913.23
200212.33
189811.39
199211.39
198811.35
Athens
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
200919.00
198916.15
192915.56
199714.54
189813.76
200412.82
195712.66
197012.63
193711.98
191811.61
Macon
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
200917.05
200414.32
192913.44
192413.05
195912.77
200011.59
197610.62
19569.96
19159.81
19889.79
Columbus
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
196412.89
199512.11
200911.69
200410.83
197610.03
19599.90
19948.87
19658.80
19758.27
19518.18




How do they make flood calculations and what do they mean?

This can actually be quite complicated because it has its roots in hydrology, engineering, statistical analysis and probability theory. So I am going to over simplify. A common problem in many fields such as geophysics, economics, meteorology and many other fields is a determination of periodicity. That is to decide if certain data taken over time provides evidence of periodic behavior which can then be used to improve prediction of future behavior for planning purposes. Examples would be how often might we expect a crop failure, an earthquake of a given magnitude, a hurricane direct hit, or a flood of X level.

So in the case of flooding, the total record of known rainfall occurrences in the past and data from past floods are combined with knowledge of the flood plain in question, the topography, land-use, vegetation, soil types, elevation and land slope of the river basin etc. and put into mathematical formulas to determine what amount of rain, over what area, over what period of time, will lead to what level of flooding in various locations. For example, when determining whether to issue a flood watch. The forecaster first determines the amount of rain expected, then consults charts of current soil moisture and river levels. Thus a 6 hour rainfall rate, 12 hour 24 hour etc. rain flood criteria is found and if it will be met or exceeded a watch is issued.

This also allows for the development of a so-called 100 year flood plain map or base flood and a 500 year or extreme flood plain map used for urban planning. A 100-year flood is major flooding. A 500 year flood is extreme and historic. Lesser flood levels can also be calculated.

Mother nature of course does not follow statistics because it is a non-linear or chaotic system. Nature can give us three 100 year floods in one year or two 500 year floods in a single decade, or a 500 year drought followed by a 500 year flood within a 3 year period or anything she wants, as the extreme climate variation Georgia has seen over the last 5-15 years testifies.

Specifically the term a 100 year flood does NOT mean such a flood should be expected only once in a lifetime or once every 100 years. It means such a level of flooding from the aforementioned formulas has a 1% chance of occurring in ANY given year and therefore is a 1/100 year event, statistically speaking it should occur once in every 100 years. The 500-year flood has a 00.2% chance of occurring in any given year and therefore statistically would be expected to occur once every 500 years.

FEMA publishes flood insurance rate maps (F.I.R.M.) that show various categories of flood hazard zones. However, the calculations, engineering, and surveying needed to determine those zones are done by engineers working in the private sector. This work might be done under these circumstances:

  1. An area-wide study (maybe an entire county) to update a set of F.I.R.M.s, such as for an urbanizing area. This will normally be contracted by the local community, often with Federal and State funding.
  2. Study of a specific river or stream, within a single community, to assist with planning and orderly development. The community will normally contract with the engineer.
  3. Study of a short stretch of a waterway that is to be developed (or has been developed) to determine the impact of the development on the flood-carrying capacity. This is typically contracted and paid for totally in the private sector.
  4. Occasionally FEMA itself, or another branch of the Federal or State government will contract with private sector engineers for a major flood study. This is most typically true for levee systems or flood control dams and reservoirs.

Hydrology and Hydraulics

For this flood plain work, the engineer must complete certain calculations. Hydrology calculations predict rainfall and compute the resulting stream flow. This is determined by the physical characteristics of the drainage basin--area, slope, shape, soil type, amount of development--and the regional climate--probable rainfall pattern and intensity based on years of historical records.

FEMA procedures require that all flood mapping be based on what is called the 100-year flood. This is the rainfall amount and associated stream flow that have a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year (and thus statistically should occur once every hundred years). FEMA calls this the base flood. Calculations are also done for the 500 year flood, although that is less important in flood insurance issues than is the base flood.

Hydraulic calculations take the run-off determined from hydrology and compute the depth and spread of flood waters. The physical characteristics of the stream, such as slope, main channel dimensions, overbank dimensions, roughness, obstructions, and development on the overbank, are all factored into the calculations.

The hydraulics of most interest are for the base flood. The calculations determine the height of flood waters from the 100 year rainfall, which is then called the base flood elevation (BFE). This is the elevation of greatest regulatory significance within the flood plain.

Flooding occurs when an existing stream (such as a river or creek) can't handle the waterflow. The cause of the high waterflow varies, but generally comes from high amounts of precipitation, or from snowmelt. The existing channel is overwhelmed, and the water "comes out of bank" to enter what is termed the flood plain.

The floodplain is a part the terrain adjacent to the channel where water doesn't normally flow; a floodplain is often not obvious to the inexperienced observer. A floodplain is simply a natural storage reservoir for flood waters, and has been created by nature, the master engineer, through thousands of years of water flow and floods.

When water leaves the normal flow channel, you have a flood event. The flood level is defined by the amount of water present. There are two general factors affecting the level of the flood:

  • The amount of water in the channel.
  • The shape and characteristics of the channel at a given point.

The amount of water is governed by local precipitation: snowpack, rainfall, and sometimes storage capacity in a reservoir.

The channel and shape characteristics control how fast the water flows. A narrow, steep channel tends to move water quickly, while a wide, flat channel moves water slowly. When water moves slowly, it tends to rise, or back up. This can cause over bank flooding. Other factors, such as vegetation and soil, will also affect water flow.

Flood events are defined by the probability that a certain amount of water is possible any one year. For example, the infamous "100-year flood" is in fact the level of water with a 1-percent chance (1 in 100) occurring any one year. The amount of water actually varies from river to river. In fact, that amount can vary along a river. The use of "n year flood" is technical jargon that has caused endless problems with the public. The term does not mean that a flood occurs every n years, but that it has a chance of 1/n of occurring any one year. Water volume increases as the probability decreases. The table below shows how this might affect you:

Flood Probabilities for any one year
"Year"ProbabilityPercentFlows
5000.00200.2%Extreme
1000.01001.0%Major
500.02002.0%Moderate
250.04004.0%Light to moderate
100.10010.0%Light
50.20020.0%Mild

In short, the infrequent floods tend to high and violent water flows (and a good thing, too!). The common floods are much smaller, although damage is still possible.

"Great!" you say, "But how high is a 5-year flood?" The answer, as noted earlier, is not simple. That's because the climate varies, and conditions affecting water flow along a channel change. Therefore, each site must be examined to determine the potential water elevations! This has been done extensively across the country by FEMA, for 100 and 500 year flood plains in selected communities. Such a study is rarely made for lesser floods, although data from 100 flood plain studies can yield estimates for lesser floods.



How wet you say?

By
Kirk Mellish
@ November 5, 2009 5:45 AM
Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA
200 PM EDT WED NOV 4 2009

...HISTORICAL RAINFALL FREQUENCY AMOUNTS OCCUR OVER PORTIONS OF
NORTH GEORGIA IN SEPTEMBER 2009...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HAS BEEN REVIEWING THE EXTREME HEAVY
RAINFALL THAT OCCURRED IN SEPTEMBER 2009 WHICH CAUSED EPIC FLOODING
IN PORTIONS OF NORTH GEORGIA. NUMEROUS LOCATIONS IN DOUGLAS...EAST
PAULDING...WEST COBB...EAST CARROLL...CENTRAL GWINNETT AND SOUTHWEST
WALKER COUNTIES EXCEEDED 10 INCHES OF RAIN DURING A 24 HOUR PERIOD.
THE GREATEST AMOUNT WAS 16.7 INCHES JUST WEST OF DOUGLASVILLE.

THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE FOR 24 HOUR RAINFALL FREQUENCY PERIODS IN
NORTH GEORGIA AND THE CHANCES OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...

7.2 INCHES IS 1.0 PERCENT...100 YEAR RAIN EVENT
7.7 INCHES IS 0.5 PERCENT...200 YEAR RAIN EVENT
8.2 INCHES IS 0.2 PERCENT...500 YEAR RAIN EVENT
8.7 INCHES IS 0.1 PERCENT...1000 YEAR RAIN EVENT
9.7 INCHES IS 0.05 PERCENT...5000 YEAR RAIN EVENT

USING RAINFALL FREQUENCY CALCULATIONS...IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THE
CHANCES OF 10 INCHES OR MORE OCCURRING AT ANY GIVEN POINT ARE LESS
THAN ONE HUNDRETH OF ONE PERCENT. THIS MEANS THE ODDS ARE 1 IN 10000
OR MORE OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...OR A 10000 YEAR RAIN EVENT.

WEATHER RADAR ESTIMATES COMBINED WITH AUTOMATED HOURLY RAINGAGE
REPORTS INDICATED THE 24 HOUR PERIOD WITH THE MOST INTENSE RAINFALL
FOR THE WHOLE STORM EVENT WAS FROM 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 20.

After being in a drought much of the last three years, several sites across north and central Georgia has received some of the highest rainfall in the past month or so. For instance, October 2009 is the second wettest October ever at both Atlanta and Athens. The only October that had more rainfall in Atlanta was 1995 when the remnants of Hurricane Opal moved across the area early in the month bringing more than 8 inches to Atlanta over a three day period. The 2009 year in Athens will be second only to October of 1937 when Athens received 11.23 inches of rain. The following table shows the top ten wettest Octobers at Atlanta, Athens, Columbus and Macon:

Atlanta
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
199511.04
20098.71
19667.53
19597.14
19326.90
19376.30
19706.29
19156.15
19906.12
19146.04
Athens
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
193711.23
20099.14
19188.21
19147.95
19977.75
19647.73
19867.65
19777.41
18987.40
19957.29
Macon
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
19599.39
19158.46
19297.49
19947.36
19707.16
19666.61
20096.37
19936.37
19906.31
19115.96
Columbus
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
19958.41
19648.09
19596.59
20096.39
20085.48
19755.42
19945.41
19765.06
19664.70
19704.47




Looking at rainfall amounts since September 1, Athens and Macon was the wettest 61 day period for September and October on record, while Atlanta was number 2 and Columbus was number 3. It is interesting to note that the rainfall experienced this year is in no way attributable to a landfalling Tropical Storm or Hurricane. A look back through the National Hurricane Center's Archives shows that the remnants of Tropical Storm Irene impacted Columbus October 6-10th, 1959; Hurricane Dora affected Columbus September 9-12, 1964; and the remnants of Hurricane Opal impacted both Columbus and Atlanta October 3-6th, 1995. Unfortunately data on tropical storms in 1888 and 1937 was unavailable.


Atlanta
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
188818.25
200917.65
200415.84
199513.56
198913.35
192913.23
200212.33
189811.39
199211.39
198811.35
Athens
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
200919.00
198916.15
192915.56
199714.54
189813.76
200412.82
195712.66
197012.63
193711.98
191811.61
Macon
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
200917.05
200414.32
192913.44
192413.05
195912.77
200011.59
197610.62
19569.96
19159.81
19889.79
Columbus
WETTEST
YEARRAINFALL
196412.89
199512.11
200911.69
200410.83
197610.03
19599.90
19948.87
19658.80
19758.27
19518.18





For more on flood calculations scroll down my blog for the report on the "500 year flood"

Pacific
1) ENSO Cycle (+0.7 to +1.0 C as of 10/12/09): defined as current status of the El Nino Southern Oscillation Cycle as reported by the US Climate Prediction Center in a brief diagnostic discussion as well as the weekly ENSO update.

2) PDO Index (positive phase as of 10/8/09): The Pacific Decadal Oscillation is defined as monitoring the "leading principal component of North Pacific monthly sea surface temperature variability (poleward of 20N for the 1900-93 period)." Researchers at the University of Washington suggest that "combining ENSO and PDO information may enhance the skill of empirical North American climate forecasts." Sources: UWA, Climate Impacts Group.

Atlantic
1) SSTA (Data pending): Defined as sea surface temperature anomalies for the Gulf of Mexico and West Atlantic. The American Meteorological Society states in a February 2003 journal article that "Using a combination of statistical methods and monthly SST anomalies (SSTAs) from one or two ocean regions" there are strong correlations between sea surface temperatures and precipitation during much of the year in the United States."

2) 2009 Hurricane Season (Data pending): Defined as the frequency and track of tropical cyclones in the Atlantic basin. It is hypothesized for discussion that a less active hurricane season combined with a positive ENSO cycle may correlate to increased probability of significant winter storms in the Eastern United States in the following six month period from October to March. Historical data supporting this hypothesis will be provided.

B) Cryosphere (Monitoring specific data sets about the frozen part of the northern hemisphere's polar water system)
1. Arctic sea ice (5.27 mil sq. km as of 9/28): Defined as the total surface area in million square kilometers of sea ice within the Arctic Circle as reported weekly by the National Ice Center.

2. N. Hemispheric snow cover (data pending): Defined as a visual interpretation and data on extent of snow cover across the United States, Canada, Russia, Northern Asia and Europe

C) Atmospheric Data (Monitoring quantitative indices which track variability in atmospheric teleconnective patterns, such as how might air pressure changes over Greenland affect the track of a US East coast storm). Note: Data and info for this section posted later Sunday.

NAO: North Atlantic Oscillation Index (my preferred "local teleconnection" that reveals much about current weather, upcoming pattern changes, storm tracks and cold outbreaks)
PNA: Pacific-North American Index
MJO: Madden-Julian Oscillation Index (wildly intriguing atmospheric hiccup that has been suggested by some is a major factor in the ENSO cycle-- details later.)
QBO: Quasi-Biennial Oscillation Index (interesting pattern relationships between easterly or westerly phase of this index, current solar cycle and latitude variation of North Atlantic winter storms.) Source: 1988 article in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.
now this one's a toughie..
AAM: Axial Angular Momentun of the Atmosphere. (you better take some Tylenol before we go over this.)

D) Solar Cycle (data pending): Defined as the monthly mean, frequency and duration of sun spots as an influential factor in Earth climate)

BASIC PROJECTIONS: The current "lakes cutter" pattern I believe will shift back to the East Coast within two weeks. If this shift aligns with several climate teleconnections that suggest a return to cold EVEN BEFORE 11/15, the potential remains for a surprisingly early arrival of significant winter weather into the Mid-Atlantic.

GENERAL CLIMATE & WEATHER TRENDS: The fading and less-than-active hurricane season has permitted sea surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico and western Atlantic to remain at or above normal. This has enhanced warm moisture advection into developing systems. The biggest Colorado snowstorm in 12 years is continuing evidence of this trend, clearly demonstrating the influence a strong subtropical jet can have in delivering moisture from the the East Pacific. Other indicators:

- Recovery of Arctic sea ice at faster rate than previous 3 years;
- Recovery of Northern Hemispheric snow cover, notably in Eurasia;
- Strengthening El Nino signature (warming to 1.4 C in region 4);
- Favorable North Pacific ocean temp pattern (PDO: 0.09 in Aug / 0.54 in Sep);
- Solar cycle status similar to 1901-03, similar anomalous Autumn temps.
This nice write up is provided by Science teacher Mr. Foot of Baltimore County Schools.


UGA Tornado Research

By
Kirk Mellish
@ October 18, 2009 12:18 PM
Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
Correlation does not always equal causation. It seems to me that a wet fall and or winter is a sign of an active jet stream across the Southern U.S. so it stands to reason that such a pattern will linger into the Spring before breaking down if it's going to do so. Thus more rain days equal more storm days and thus more "opportunities" for tornadoes. If you are in a high pressure ridge pattern over the South keeping the jet stream storm track further North and West, then logically this creates drought and if you are in a winter drought it too will likely linger into the Spring before the pattern breaks down if it is going to do so. Drought means less rain storms which means less severe storms thus logically fewer "opportunities" for tornadoes. Here is the abstract and the link to the full research online.

A seasonal-scale climatological analysis correlating spring tornadic activity with antecedent fall-winter drought in the southeastern United States

Marshall Shepherd1, Dev Niyogi2 and Thomas L Mote1

1 Climate Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Received 10 February 2009
Accepted 16 June 2009
Published 24 June 2009

Abstract. Using rain gauge and satellite-based rainfall climatologies and the NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database (1952-2007), this study found a statistically significant tendency for fall-winter drought conditions to be correlated with below-normal tornado days the following spring in north Georgia (i.e. 93% of the years) and other regions of the Southeast. Non-drought years had nearly twice as many tornado days in the study area as drought years and were also five to six times more likely to have multiple tornado days. Individual tornadic events are largely a function of the convective-mesoscale thermodynamic and dynamic environments, thus the study does not attempt to overstate predictability. Yet, the results may provide seasonal guidance in an analogous manner to the well known Sahelian rainfall and Cape Verde hurricane activity relationships. UGA drought-tornado relationship research paper




They only give probabilities and don't say anything about snow or ice for anyone. Here is their outlook:

NOAA: El Niño to Help Steer U.S. Winter Weather

October 15, 2009

Winter Outlook - Precipitation

High Resolution (Credit: NOAA)

El Niño in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean is expected to be a dominant climate factor that will influence the December through February winter weather in the United States, according to the 2009 Winter Outlook released today by NOAA's Climate Prediction Center. Such seasonal outlooks are part of NOAA's suite of climate services.

"We expect El Niño to strengthen and persist through the winter months, providing clues as to what the weather will be like during the period," says Mike Halpert, deputy director of the Climate Prediction Center - a division of the National Weather Service. "Warmer ocean water in the equatorial Pacific shifts the patterns of tropical rainfall that in turn change the strength and position of the jetstream and storms over the Pacific Ocean and the U.S."

"Other climate factors are also likely to play a role in the winter weather at times across the country," added Halpert. "Some of these factors, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation are difficult to predict more than one to two weeks in advance. The NAO adds uncertainty to the forecast in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic portions of the country."

Highlights of the U.S. Winter Outlook (December through February) include:

  • Winter Outlook - Temperature

    High Resolution (Credit: NOAA)

    Warmer-than-average temperatures are favored across much of the western and central U.S., especially in the north-central states from Montana to Wisconsin. Though temperatures may average warmer than usual, periodic outbreaks of cold air are still possible.
  • Below-average temperatures are expected across the Southeast and mid-Atlantic from southern and eastern Texas to southern Pennsylvania and south through Florida.
  • Above-average precipitation is expected in the southern border states, especially Texas and Florida. Recent rainfall and the prospects of more should improve current drought conditions in central and southern Texas. However, tornado records suggest that there will also be an increased chance of organized tornado activity for the Gulf Coast region this winter.
  • Drier-than-average conditions are expected in the Pacific Northwest and the Ohio and Tennessee River Valleys.
  • Northeast: Equal chances for above-, near-, or below-normal temperatures and precipitation. Winter weather in this region is often driven not by El Niño but by weather patterns over the northern Atlantic Ocean and Arctic, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation. These patterns are often more short-term, and are generally predictable only a week or so in advance.
  • California: A slight tilt in the odds toward wetter-than-average conditions over the entire state.
  • Alaska: Milder-than-average temperatures except along the western coast. Equal chances for above-, near-, or below-median precipitation for most areas except above median for the northwest.
  • Hawaii: Below-average temperatures and precipitation are favored for the entire state..

This seasonal outlook does not predict where and when snowstorms may hit or total seasonal snowfall accumulations. Snow forecasts are dependent upon winter storms, which are generally not predictable more than several days in advance.



What does that mean, a "100-year flood"?

By
Kirk Mellish
@ October 14, 2009 10:07 AM
Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
This can actually be quite complicated because it has its roots in hydrology, engineering, statistical analysis and probability theory. So I am going to over simplify. A common problem in many fields such as geophysics, economics, meteorology and many other fields is a determination of periodicity. That is to decide if certain data taken over time provides evidence of periodic behavior which can then be used to improve prediction of future behavior for planning purposes. Examples would be how often might we expect a crop failure, an earthquake of a given magnitude, a hurricane direct hit, or a flood of X level.

So in the case of flooding, the total record of known rainfall occurrences in the past and data from past floods are combined with knowledge of the flood plain in question, the topography, land-use, vegetation, soil types, elevation and land slope of the river basin etc. and put into mathematical formulas to determine what amount of rain, over what area, over what period of time, will lead to what level of flooding in various locations. For example, when determining whether to issue a flood watch. The forecaster first determines the amount of rain expected, then consults charts of current soil moisture and river levels. Thus a 6 hour rainfall rate, 12 hour 24 hour etc. rain flood criteria is found and if it will be met or exceeded a watch is issued.

This also allows for the development of a so-called 100 year flood plain map or base flood and a 500 year or extreme flood plain map used for urban planning. A 100-year flood is major flooding. A 500 year flood is extreme and historic. Lesser flood levels can also be calculated.

Mother nature of course does not follow statistics because it is a non-linear or chaotic system. Nature can give us three 100 year floods in one year or two 500 year floods in a single decade, or a 500 year drought followed by a 500 year flood within a 3 year period or anything she wants, as the extreme climate variation Georgia has seen over the last 5-15 years testifies.

Specifically the term a 100 year flood does NOT mean such a flood should be expected only once in a lifetime or once every 100 years. It means such a level of flooding from the aforementioned formulas has a 1% chance of occurring in ANY given year and therefore is a 1/100 year event, statistically speaking it should occur once in every 100 years. The 500-year flood has a 00.2% chance of occurring in any given year and therefore statistically would be expected to occur once every 500 years.

FEMA publishes flood insurance rate maps (F.I.R.M.) that show various categories of flood hazard zones. However, the calculations, engineering, and surveying needed to determine those zones are done by engineers working in the private sector. This work might be done under these circumstances:

  1. An area-wide study (maybe an entire county) to update a set of F.I.R.M.s, such as for an urbanizing area. This will normally be contracted by the local community, often with Federal and State funding.
  2. Study of a specific river or stream, within a single community, to assist with planning and orderly development. The community will normally contract with the engineer.
  3. Study of a short stretch of a waterway that is to be developed (or has been developed) to determine the impact of the development on the flood-carrying capacity. This is typically contracted and paid for totally in the private sector.
  4. Occasionally FEMA itself, or another branch of the Federal or State government will contract with private sector engineers for a major flood study. This is most typically true for levee systems or flood control dams and reservoirs.

Hydrology and Hydraulics

For this flood plain work, the engineer must complete certain calculations. Hydrology calculations predict rainfall and compute the resulting stream flow. This is determined by the physical characteristics of the drainage basin--area, slope, shape, soil type, amount of development--and the regional climate--probable rainfall pattern and intensity based on years of historical records.

FEMA procedures require that all flood mapping be based on what is called the 100-year flood. This is the rainfall amount and associated stream flow that have a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year (and thus statistically should occur once every hundred years). FEMA calls this the base flood. Calculations are also done for the 500 year flood, although that is less important in flood insurance issues than is the base flood.

Hydraulic calculations take the run-off determined from hydrology and compute the depth and spread of flood waters. The physical characteristics of the stream, such as slope, main channel dimensions, overbank dimensions, roughness, obstructions, and development on the overbank, are all factored into the calculations.

The hydraulics of most interest are for the base flood. The calculations determine the height of flood waters from the 100 year rainfall, which is then called the base flood elevation (BFE). This is the elevation of greatest regulatory significance within the flood plain.

Flooding occurs when an existing stream (such as a river or creek) can't handle the waterflow. The cause of the high waterflow varies, but generally comes from high amounts of precipitation, or from snowmelt. The existing channel is overwhelmed, and the water "comes out of bank" to enter what is termed the flood plain.

The floodplain is a part the terrain adjacent to the channel where water doesn't normally flow; a floodplain is often not obvious to the inexperienced observer. A floodplain is simply a natural storage reservoir for flood waters, and has been created by nature, the master engineer, through thousands of years of water flow and floods.

When water leaves the normal flow channel, you have a flood event. The flood level is defined by the amount of water present. There are two general factors affecting the level of the flood:

  • The amount of water in the channel.
  • The shape and characteristics of the channel at a given point.

The amount of water is governed by local precipitation: snowpack, rainfall, and sometimes storage capacity in a reservoir.

The channel and shape characteristics control how fast the water flows. A narrow, steep channel tends to move water quickly, while a wide, flat channel moves water slowly. When water moves slowly, it tends to rise, or back up. This can cause over bank flooding. Other factors, such as vegetation and soil, will also affect water flow.

Flood events are defined by the probability that a certain amount of water is possible any one year. For example, the infamous "100-year flood" is in fact the level of water with a 1-percent chance (1 in 100) occurring any one year. The amount of water actually varies from river to river. In fact, that amount can vary along a river. The use of "n year flood" is technical jargon that has caused endless problems with the public. The term does not mean that a flood occurs every n years, but that it has a chance of 1/n of occurring any one year. Water volume increases as the probability decreases. The table below shows how this might affect you:

Flood Probabilities for any one year
"Year"ProbabilityPercentFlows
5000.00200.2%Extreme
1000.01001.0%Major
500.02002.0%Moderate
250.04004.0%Light to moderate
100.10010.0%Light
50.20020.0%Mild

In short, the infrequent floods tend to high and violent water flows (and a good thing, too!). The common floods are much smaller, although damage is still possible.

"Great!" you say, "But how high is a 5-year flood?" The answer, as noted earlier, is not simple. That's because the climate varies, and conditions affecting water flow along a channel change. Therefore, each site must be examined to determine the potential water elevations! This has been done extensively across the country by FEMA, for 100 and 500 year flood plains in selected communities. Such a study is rarely made for lesser floods, although data from 100 flood plain studies can yield estimates for lesser floods.







Eyes on the creeks ears on the radio

By
Kirk Mellish
@ October 13, 2009 10:57 AM
Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Most new info will be shared on the radio this afternoon and tomorrow. But before I go to lunch thought I would add this quick info RE: flood risk tomorrow from NWS...

MODELS INDICATE
WIDESPREAD 2-4 INCHES...AND 12Z MODELS COMING IN THIS MORNING HAVE
HIGHER QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS (QPF)THAN LAST NIGHT`S RUNS.
WILL HAVE TO KEEP AN EYE ON
THINGS BUT MODELS TYPICALLY ARE UNDERDONE ON LARGE QPF EVENTS.
EXPECT WIDESPREAD MINOR FLOODING AT LEAST...WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED
TO SEE SEVERAL GAUGES RISE TO MODERATE FLOOD STAGE WITH PERHAPS A
FEW MAJORS. STAY TUNED FOR FURTHER UPDATES ON THIS SITUATION.

Weather headlines in the news

By
Kirk Mellish
@ October 11, 2009 5:47 PM
Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)
A cold outbreak befitting November much more than October has already left a trail of broken temperature records in its wake, there will be many new record lows over an area from northern Wyoming and the western Dakotas to Washington, northern Oregon and southern British Columbia. These readings, sometimes 25 degrees below normal, will shatter old records by 10 degrees or more in some instances. In the wake of the record-breaking cold air and snow that plunged through the Rockies and Plains early in the weekend, a new disturbance is spreading accumulating snow from Wyoming into the northern Plains. Up to half of a foot of snow could fall. Meanwhile Florida is having record warm temperatures. Floridians who have been enduring record heat since early last week will have to wait until the end of this week before any of these fronts bring in cooler air.Such a combination usually leads to an active storm zone in-between and that will be the case the next week or two. Sunday night through Monday areas from the western Gulf Coast to the southernmost Appalachians and Carolina Outer Banks will be wet rainfall along this corridor also stretching the much of Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia will often exceed 1 inch. Highest amounts will reach at least 3 inches. Another round of showers and thunderstorms will surge northward and eastward through the South Tuesday into Wednesday. Toward the end of the week, a powerful storm system moving across the Midwest will drag a cold front through the region, sparking more showers and thunderstorms.

The storms that develop ahead of this cold front will have a better shot at becoming severe Thursday into Friday. This front is expected to push southward into Florida by next weekend, bringing an end to the heat wave that has been gripping the state.


Minor, local flooding may stem from this latest rash of southern downpours. Wider impact will be that of rain-slicked roadways and the slowing of highway traffic. And travelers through the airport may find delayed flights.


Further heavy rains will hit areas of the South later in the week. On Monday, an area of snow will reach into northern Wisconsin and northern Michigan along with parts of northern Ontario, Canada. Snow will reach east out of Wyoming and over South Dakota and northern Nebraska into central and southern Minnesota and even northwest Iowa. On Monday, the corridor of snowfall will reach into northern Wisconsin and northern Michigan along with parts of northern Ontario, Canada.


The highest snowfall of 3 to locally 6 inches will stretch eastward from Wyoming near the South Dakota-Nebraska line. However, most amounts along this snow band will range from 1 to 3 inches.


The snow and unusual cold will make for conditions of wintry driving with road surfaces varying from slush and wet to slick, icy and hazardous. Interstate highways I-25, I-29, I-35, I-80, I-90 and I-94 will be among the key roadways subject to wintry driving conditions. Minneapolis-Saint Paul will get its first significant snowfall of the season from this storm.The first big Pacific storm is set to strike California and the rest of the West Coast as early as late Monday night. The monster storm will bring with it plenty of rain, some very heavy, along with strong gusty winds. Rain amount by Wednesday morning will top 6 inches in a few instance, amounts of 2-4 inches being widespread over the northern two-thirds of the state. These are connected to last week's powerful western Pacific Typhoon. Melor dissipated after a pounding of Japan, but its heavy load of tropical warmth and moisture has since been handed off down stream to a storm slated to reach the California coast on Tuesday. Southern California north and west of Los Angles is much more likely to get a soaking than areas from the city on south and east.

Weather buzz in the East is likely to include talk of early snow late in the week. The storm will have tropical warmth and moisture to one side and some unusually early cold to the other.


The storm center will track across the mid-Mississippi Valley by early Thursday on to the Atlantic Seaboard on Friday. Cold soaking rain will fall north of the immediate storm track over the Ohio Valley to the mid-Atlantic.


Enough cold air will settle in place over the north-central Appalachian region to trigger a little wet snow. Should all the essential factors fall into place, a heavy wet snowfall would be the result in the higher elevations of Pennsylvania and New York. High temperatures Wednesday through Friday will be held in the 40s for the first time this season across the interior Northeast, including Buffalo, N.Y., Boston, Mass., and State College, Pa.

Temperatures at night will drop into the 20s across the higher elevations and 30s in most other areas to the north of the Mason-Dixon Line. If you haven't done so already, you may want to pull out your heavier coats for the cold mornings that lie ahead later this week. Monday night into Tuesday will bring some snow to the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the mountains of northern Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. Accumulations between 1 and 3 inches are possible.

The arctic high will keep the region mostly dry Wednesday before a powerful storm system moves through Thursday into Friday.

To the north of a cold, soaking rain this system spreads through parts of the Northeast and mid-Atlantic, a rain/snow mix or changeover to snow is expected. Where exactly this occurs will depend on the storm's track.

As it stands, areas from the eastern Great Lakes into the Appalachians will run the best chance for snow. A chance for a mix of rain and snow is already in the forecast for places like Buffalo, Binghampton and Syracuse, N.Y., as well as Burlington, Vt.


Further south, outbreaks of thunderstorms will unleash downpours, some heavy enough to spark flooding. This in a corridor that has seen at least two-times the normal rainfall since the start of September.The primary suite of medium-range models (GFS, ECMWF, GEM) have suggested that in parts of Georgia we will have to monitor potential for some flooding, some severe weather and at the tail end of the event MAYBE an early frost or freeze and maybe just maybe some curiosity flurries as the seasons first Nor 'Easter brings winter from the Great Lakes region to New England and then sends a sliver South into the heart of Dixie or the Southeast. As always I remind you the models are simulations not the real weather and even if they all agree they can all be wrong, and the devil is in the details and I will take care of that on a daily basis on the radio.

Leaving America, An outbreak of cold more fitting of December than October will knife southward out of Scandinavia into the heart of central and eastern Europe early this week. Rain and snow from Germany and Poland south into the middle of the Balkan Peninsula. Significant snowfall will keep mostly to hilly peeks and, especially, to the mountains such as the Carpathian, Alps and Balkan highlands. Locally, there will be heavy mountain snow.


Soaking rain will break out near the Adriatic Sea on Monday, then will shift east to Romania, Bulgaria and western Ukraine by mid week.


The stormy weather could disrupt ground travel. Delays and cancellations of flights to and from destinations in central and western Europe.






More winter outlooks look the same

By
Kirk Mellish
@ October 8, 2009 6:38 AM
Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
It is interesting to note that since I issued my preliminary winter forecast a host of other sources have come out with their winter outlooks and they all look at least similar. From Southern Nevada to Idaho record early snows have fallen already and more snow storms are on the way for the Mountain West and into the Northern Plains and upper Midwest.

The Commodity Weather Group is calling for the coldest winter in a decade in much of the East and South U.S. Both the Farmers Almanac and The Old Farmers Almanac are calling for quite a winter. A couple forecasters at Accu-Weather are calling for cold and above-normal snow in the East and South. A private forecaster formerly at the Weather Channel and ABC News Joe D'Aleo is calling for a cold winter for much of the country. Weather Services International is calling for colder than normal weather in the Southeast USA October through December. Both the European and American long-range climate models are pointing in the same direction for the Fall and Winter. Much of this is based on the El Nino condition being on the weak side which correlates with a 70-75% chance of below-normal winter temps East of the Mississippi River. Of course this is only one factor and it as well as the other signals we look at could change over the next couple months, if so the long-range forecast for winter will also have to change.

Natural gas prices should withstand below-normal winter temps as record high inventories are expected at least this month and maybe through December or longer.

However, I am a little concerned that most forecasters agree. This is unusual so I hope we're not all being fooled. My final forecast call will come out no later than the start of December. m

send to a friend  view as printer-friendly  RSS feeds
advertisement

WSB 24-Hour Weather Center
Get the 5-day Forecast .

Atlanta weather

Fair
68°F
5-day forecast | Hurricane Guide
advertisement

Marketplace

Cancer Wellness at Piedmont Cancer Cente
Cancer Wellness at Piedmont Cancer Center - Providing help and support to those facing cancer. Learn more.
Emory Vision
Emory Vision is the best LASIK provider in Atlanta. Learn more at our online seminar.
"How to Build Your Financial Future" Online Seminar sponsored by Associated Credit Union. Details
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Click here to view GCS's video, "Seven Things You Should Know About Breast Cancer."
advertisement
Green Home Improvement
Allan Vigil Racing Fan Frenzy
Racing Fans, play the Allan Vigil Racing Fan Frenzy now! Click here for all the details.
Resurgens Spine Center
View our webinar “The Latest In Total Joint Replacement.” Watch now
powered by AutoTrader.com Shop for cars, find a dealer, and get the latest automotive news in our Local Car Buying Guide powered by AutoTrader.com
powered by Kudzu From fast food to fine dining, find it all in our Local Business Directory .
Stay ahead of the storm. Find evacuation routes, safety tips and more in the Hurricane Guide.
News Talk 750 WSB Mobile Access
News/Talk 750 WSB wants to make sure you can access our website anytime you want from any device. Click here to find out how.
Going Green
Help do your part to save water, reduce air pollution & greenhouse emissions. Go Green!
Georgia Bulldogs Radio Network
Your online connection to the Georgia Bulldogs Radio Network team!
Read the AJC and stay on top of everything in Atlanta! Get delivery for less than $2 a week!
Join Channel 2 Action News anchors John Pruitt and Monica Pearson at 5, 6, and 11pm.