<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Kirk Mellish&apos;s Weather Commentary</title>
        <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:46:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Spring will not spring into a lock but have winter hangover</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow: hidden;">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Spring does not look to jump right toward summer but have 
winter hang-over." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/mellishweather_spring300.jpg" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="250" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Spring does not look to jump right 
toward summer but have winter hang-over.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">WSBRADIO.COM</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
Temps slightly cooler than normal rest of March and first half of April.<br />
<br />
Near normal temps 2nd half of April and May: averaging out Near normal 
to slightly cool for the 3-month season.<br />
<br />
Spring rain above normal thru mid-April then normal to drier than normal
 Mid-April to Mid-May: working out near average to above-average for the
 3-month period.<br />
<br />
MAY has the best chance to be warmer than normal.<br />
<br />
Tornado season near normal to slightly less than normal: 10 twisters in 
the state for the spring, 19 on the year. Average is 21. (This should be
 considered EXPERIMENTAL as I know of nobody who has tried to predict 
tornado season in advance and I have never tried it before)<br />
<br />
Factors that MAY help limit severe weather: lack of lasting warm air 
temps and cooler than normal Gulf of Mexico water.<br />
<br />
In summary, it looks like we only ease out of the wet cool pattern that 
started with the floods of Autumn, and we do so in fits and starts 
rather than a quick flip to permanently warm and dry.<br />
<br />
Hurricane season more active than normal:<br />
<br />
15 named storms<br />
6 hurricanes<br />
4 major<br />
<br />
Preliminary analog years: 1958, 1963, 1964, 1966, 1969, 1973, 1977, 
1978, 1995, 1998, 2003, and 2005.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/spring-will-not-spring-into-a.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/spring-will-not-spring-into-a.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long range Spring forecast 2010 hurricane season tornado season</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:46:06 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Winter has only last gasps left into mid-April time to think about coming hurricane season</title>
            <description><![CDATA[
<!-- no ratings for this article -->
                            
                           
                            
                           
           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); overflow: hidden;">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="El Nino forecast from dynamical and statistical computer 
models show the downward trend." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_SSTtable.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="259" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> El Nino forecast from dynamical and 
statistical computer models show the downward trend.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">Columbia
 University's IRI</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
El Niño events typically die out in the spring, and most of the El Niño 
computer forecast models are predicting an end to El Niño by summer. 
Note that the last time we had a strong El Niño event--the record El 
Niño of 1997 - 1998--the event ended very abruptly in May, and a La Niña
 event developed by the 1998 hurricane season. This resulted in a very 
active 1998 hurricane season (14 named storms, 10 hurricanes, and 3 
major hurricanes, including Category 5 Hurricane Mitch). The recent 
weakening of El Niño is a likely sign that there will not be El Niño 
conditions for the coming hurricane season. Only once since 1950 has an 
El Niño event lasted through two full hurricane seasons, and we do not 
expect that will occur this time, either. Given that since 1995, the 
Atlantic has been in an active hurricane period, except for in El Niño 
years, a more active than normal hurricane season is likely in 2010.<br />
<br />
Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) in the Atlantic's Main Development 
Region for hurricanes were at their highest February level on record 
last month, according to an analysis of historical SST data from the UK 
Hadley Center. SST data goes back to 1850, though there is much missing 
data before 1910 and during WWI and WWII. The region between 10°N and 
20°N, between the coast of Africa and Central America, is called the 
Main Development Region (MDR) because virtually all African waves 
originate in this region. These African waves account for 85% of all 
Atlantic major hurricanes and 60% of all named storms. When SSTs in the 
MDR are much above average during hurricane season, a very active season
 typically results (if there is no El Niño event present.)<br />
<br />
SSTs in the Main Development Region (10°N to 20°N and 20°W to 85°W) were
 an eye-opening 1.02°C above average during February. This easily beats 
the previous record of 0.83°C set in 1998. SSTs in the Main Development 
Region are already warmer than they were during June of last year, which
 is pretty remarkable, considering February is usually the coldest month
 of the year for SSTs in the North Atlantic. The 1.02°C anomaly is the 
6th highest monthly SST anomaly for the MDR on record. The only other 
months with higher anomalies all occurred during 2005 (April, May, June,
 July, and September 2005 had anomalies of 1.06°C - 1.23°C).<br />
<br />
Don't blame El Niño for the high Atlantic SSTs. El Niño is a warming of 
the Pacific waters near the Equator, and has no direct impact on 
Atlantic SSTs. Instead, blame the Arctic Oscillation (AO) or its close 
cousin, the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). The AO and NAO are climate
 patterns in the North Atlantic Ocean related to fluctuations in the 
difference of sea-level pressure between the Icelandic Low and the 
Azores-Bermuda High. They are some of the oldest known climate 
oscillations; seafaring Scandinavians described the pattern several 
centuries ago. Through east-west oscillation motions of the Icelandic 
Low and the Azores-Bermuda High, the AO/NAO controls the strength and 
direction of westerly winds and storm tracks across the North Atlantic. A
 large difference in the pressure between Iceland and the Azores 
(positive NAO) leads to increased westerly winds and mild and wet 
winters in Europe. Positive NAO conditions also cause the Icelandic Low 
to draw a stronger south-westerly flow of air over eastern North 
America, preventing Arctic air from plunging southward. In contrast, if 
the difference in sea-level pressure between Iceland and the Azores is 
small (negative NAO), westerly winds are suppressed, allowing Arctic air
 to spill southwards into eastern North America more readily. The winter
 of 2009 - 2010 has seen the most negative AO and NAO patterns since 
record keeping began in 1950, which caused a very cold winter in Florida
 and surrounding states. A negative AO/NAO implies a very weak 
Azores-Bermuda High, which reduces the trade winds circulating around 
the High. During December - February, trade winds between Africa and the
 Lesser Antilles Islands in the hurricane Main Development Region were 1
 - 2 m/s (2.2 - 4.5 mph) below average. Slower trade winds mean less 
mixing of the surface waters with cooler waters down deep, plus less 
evaporational cooling of the surface water. As a result, the ocean has 
heated up significantly, relative to normal, over the winter. This 
heating is superimposed on the very warm global SSTs we've been seeing 
over the past decade, leading to the current record warmth. Global and 
Northern Hemisphere SSTs were the 2nd warmest on record in both December
 and January.<br />
<br />
According to Dr. Phil Klotzbach of the University of Colorado, February 
temperatures in the MDR are not strongly correlated with active 
hurricane seasons. The mathematical correlation between hurricane season
 Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) and February SSTs is only 0.26, which 
is considered weak. Past hurricane seasons that had high February SST 
anomalies include 1998 (0.83°C anomaly), 2007 (0.71°C anomaly), and 1958
 (0.68°C anomaly). These three years averaged 13 named storms, 8 
hurricanes, and 3 intense hurricanes, which is considerably higher than 
the average of 10, 6, and 2. The big question is, how long will the 
strong negative AO/NAO conditions keep the Azores-Bermuda High weak? 
Well, the AO has risen to near-neutral values over the past week, and 
the latest 2-week forecast from the GFS model show that the AO and NAO 
will not be as strongly negative during March. This should allow the 
Azores-Bermuda High to strengthen some this month and increase the trade
 winds over the MDR. However, we may still set a record for warmest-ever
 March SSTs in the Main Development Region. Longer term, the crystal 
ball is very fuzzy, as our ability to predict the weather months in 
advance is poor. The long-range NOAA CFS model is predicting SSTs in the
 Atlantic MDR will be about 0.70°C above average during the peak months 
of hurricane season, making it one of the top five warmest years on 
record--but not as warm as the unbelievable Hurricane Season of 2005, 
which averaged 0.95°C above normal during August - October. When will El
 Niño fade? El Niño is currently holding steady at moderate intensity, 
and it'lll continue through at least mid-April. It is possible El Niño 
will linger long enough into the summer that it will create increased 
wind shear that will suppress this year's hurricane season.<br />
<br />
The set of dynamical and statistical model forecasts issued during late 
January and early February 2010 are in unanimous agreement about 
maintaining El Nino conditions through at least April. There is some 
disagreement about the timing and rate of dissipation, and even more 
disagreement about what ENSO condition to expect for the northern summer
 2010 and beyond. The median time of predicted SST falling below 0.5 C 
is during the AMJ or MJJ season. At the time of preparing this, the SST 
observations in the NINO3.4 region indicate moderate El Nino conditions,
 with an area-averaged weekly anomaly of 1.2 C. Current forecasts and 
observations indicate a probability of about 93% for maintaining El Nino
 conditions&nbsp; into April, and still just over 80% for the Mar-May period.<br />
<br />
For the upcoming hurricane season there are a number of factors pointing
 to a more active season than last year, and more active than the 
long-term average. The rapidly weakening El Niño, warmer ocean 
temperatures in the typical Atlantic tropical breeding grounds compared 
to last year, weakening trade winds which reduce the amount of dry air 
injected into the tropics from Africa, higher humidity levels which 
provide additional upward motion in the air and fuel tropical storm 
development energy.<br />
<br />
A number of past years set-up compare to the upcoming season, including 
1952, 1958, 1964, 1966, 1995, 1998, 2003, 2005, and 2007.<br />
<br />
This leads me to this PRELIMINARY 2010 HURRICANE SEASON OUTLOOK for the 
Atlantic-Carribean:<br />
<br />
15 Named storms <br />
<br />
6 Hurricanes<br />
<br />
4 Major hurricanes<br />
<br />
An Above-normal risk of U.S. landfall, threat of at least 2 major hits.<br />
<br />
In a typical season, there are about 11 named storms, of which two to 
three impacts the coast of the United States. The Atlantic hurricane 
season officially begins on June 1 and continues through November 30. 
These dates were selected because 97 percent of hurricane activity 
occurs during this six-month period.</p>
 


<div class="slideshowtopper"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1077870" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 
'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()">Warm Atlantic may be
 a caution flag for 2010 Hurricane Season</a> </div>
<div class="slideshowsides" align="center"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1077870" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 
'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"><img src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/slideshows/sstmar7.png" alt="Warm Atlantic may be a caution flag for 2010 Hurricane Season" border="0" /></a>
</div>

<div style="float: left; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); width: 380px;">El 
Nino in the Pacific and Wam Atlantic pools fed the wild winter, will 
oceans feed an active hurricane season?</div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/winter-has-only-last-gasps-lef.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/winter-has-only-last-gasps-lef.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter hurricane season tropical storms spring summer El Nino Pacific Atlantic Ocean</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:57:45 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Winter break: the worst should be over but no smooth ride to summer</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Snow was seen much more often in Atlanta this winter." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_atlsnow.jpg" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="227" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Snow was seen much more often in Atlanta this winter.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">ninaspace.typepad.com/my_weblog/adam_roberts/</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>While winter's back appears broken Old Man Winter has probably not gone to Florida or Arizona to stay until next year just yet, even if odds of snow are slim especially South of the Perimeter/Mountains.</p><p> The 30-DAY OUTLOOK for Georgia is for temperatures to be below-normal on average with precipitation above-normal on average. The 60-90 DAY OUTLOOK is for near-normal conditions on average. March is often a volatile month of extremes and is known as "bowling ball" season for the cut-off lows that look like bowling balls on the upper-air charts. They are known for bringing surprises if they pass over your area. Be sure to click on the link at the bottom to see the national maps of the winter that was 2009-10.<br /></p>My December 1st winter forecast for below-normal temps and normal to
above-normal snow and ice came through in spades. For Atlanta at the
official airport station: December was -3.1F and precip was 138%
above-normal. January was -4.2F with precip 7% above-normal. February
was -7.1F with precip 11% below-normal. Total winter time precip was
45% above-normal. There was a TRACE of snow on December 5th and 30th,
just over half an inch 1/2 snow on January 7th, a TRACE of snow on
February 6th, 10th, 16th, and 24th and- 3.6 inches snow Feb 12th. 1.1
inches fell at the Airport March 2nd, while 3-6 fell in the North
Suburbs and 10 in the high mountains. December precip was 9.10 inches,
January 5.38, and February 4.17 inches.<br /><br />The average temperatures for the December 2009 - February 2010 period
were among some of the coldest ever across north and central Georgia.
90 out of 100 winters would be warmer. It's not that there was extreme or historic cold lows, just a big lack of mild spells we usually see. Each of the four climate sites - Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson
International Airport, Athens Ben Epps Airport, Columbus Metropolitan
Airport and Macon/Middle Georgia Regional Airport - saw average
temperatures among the ten coldest ever recorded. The average
temperatures Columbus had the 4th coldest average temperature for the
winter season, while Macon tied for the 5th coldest, Atlanta was the
eighth coldest and Athens tied for the ninth coldest winter season.<br />
<br />
Average Temperatures (December 1 - February 28 Meteorological Winter)<br />
Atlanta<br />
YEAR Average<br />
Temperature<br />
1976-1977 36.9<br />
1977-1978 38.3<br />
1962-1963 38.8<br />
1963-1964 38.8<br />
1935-1936 38.9<br />
1939-1940 39.0<br />
1901-1902 39.2<br />
2009-2010 40.1<br />
1885-1886 40.2<br />
1917-1918 40.2<br />
Athens<br />
YEAR Average<br />
Temperature<br />
1976-1977 38.4<br />
1904-1905 38.6<br />
1917-1918 38.6<br />
1903-1904 38.9<br />
1977-1978 39.2<br />
1909-1910 39.4<br />
1962-1963 39.8<br />
1963-1964 39.9<br />
1935-1936 40.4<br />
2009-2010 40.4<br />
Macon<br />
YEAR Average<br />
Temperature<br />
1976-1977 42.8<br />
1977-1978 43.4<br />
1935-1936 43.5<br />
1939-1940 43.5<br />
1901-1902 43.6<br />
2009-2010 43.6<br />
1904-1905 43.7<br />
1963-1964 43.8<br />
1917-1918 44.0<br />
1903-1904 44.2<br />
Columbus<br />
YEAR Average<br />
Temperature<br />
1976-1977 42.6<br />
1963-1964 42.9<br />
1977-1978 43.2<br />
2009-2010 43.4<br />
1962-1963 43.5<br />
1969-1970 43.6<br />
1957-1958 43.7<br />
1968-1969 45.1<br />
1960-1961 45.6<br />
1965-1966 45.9<br />
<br />
The total snowfall this season at Atlanta breaks top 5 for total
snowfall recorded December through March for the period of record. As
of midnight Wednesday March 3, the total snowfall for the winter season
so far is 5.3 inches which is now the fifth highest since accurate snow
records began in 1929. Additionally...the snow on March 2nd marks the
third time measurable snow and the tenth time at least a trace of snow
or sleet fell at Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport this
season. In an average winter season...Atlanta typically experiences 4
days of measurable snow and 6 days with a trace or more of snow or
sleet. These represent what falls from the sky not what stays on the
ground, more typically there is no accumulation.<br />
<br />
Snowfall (December 1 - March 30)<br />
Atlanta<br />
Normal 2.5 inches<br />
Total through March 2nd<br />
5.3 inches<br />
YEAR SNOWFALL<br />
1935 10.9<br />
1982 10.3<br />
1939 8.3<br />
1981 7.7<br />
1991 5.0<br />
1959 4.8<br />
1986 4.8<br />
1978 4.6<br />
1933 4.5<br />
1961 4.5<br />
Athens<br />
Normal 2.5 inches<br />
Total through March 2nd<br />
5.0 inches<br />
YEAR SNOWFALL<br />
1935 12.0<br />
1982 10.6<br />
1939 9.8<br />
1959 8.6<br />
1933 8.2<br />
1986 7.5<br />
1981 7.1<br />
1979 6.3<br />
1965 5.6<br />
1978 4.7<br />
Macon<br />
Normal 1.6 inches<br />
Total through March 2nd<br />
3.0 inches<br />
YEAR SNOWFALL<br />
1972 16.5<br />
1935 4.6<br />
1954 3.7<br />
1978 3.4<br />
1939 3.0<br />
1976 3.0<br />
1967 2.9<br />
1992 2.6<br />
1981 2.2<br />
1987 2.1<br />
Columbus<br />
Normal 1.1 inches<br />
Total through March 2nd<br />
2.0 inches<br />
YEAR SNOWFALL<br />
1972 14.0<br />
1992 2.5<br />
1978 2.0<br />
1981 2.0<br />
1993 1.6<br />
1976 1.4<br />
1979 1.0<br />
1982 1.0<br />
1987 1.0<br />
1996 1.0<br /><br /><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner%7Ey2010m3d7-How-cold-and-snowy-was-the-winter-of-20092010">For maps of the winter click here.</a><br /> <div><br />Georgia's Winter Expensive<br /><br />By David Emory Stooksbury&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <br />University of Georgia<br /><br />This past winter was unusually cold and wet across Georgia, causing the heating demand for buildings to soar. <br /><br />Climatological winter runs from December 1 to the last day in February. This winter was typical of an El Niño one for Georgia -- but on hyperdrive. The average mean daily temperature was extremely cold statewide.&nbsp; The daily mean temperature is calculated by taking the daily maximum temperature plus the daily minimum temperature then dividing the sum by two.<br /><br />This past winter will be remembered for its long periods of below-normal temperatures. It wasn't that Georgia experienced long periods of bitterly cold temperatures in the single digits. It was the lack of the typical warm periods between the cold periods.<br /><br />The average mean temperature in north Georgia this winter was near the fourth percentile, depending on the location. Locations in south Georgia experienced mean winter temperatures near the seventh percentile. At the fourth percentile, 96 out of 100 winters would be warmer. At the seventh percentile, 93 out of 100 winters would be warmer.<br /><br />The average daily minimum temperatures for the winter were around the tenth percentile statewide, except around Savannah, where the average minimum temperatures were near the fifth percentile. At the tenth percentile, 90 out of 100 winters would be warmer. <br /><br />While the daily minimum temperatures were on average cold, it was the daily maximum temperatures that were the most impressively cold. <br /><br />At locations across the southern half of Georgia, the average daily maximum temperatures were either the first or second percentiles. At the first percentile, 99 years out of 100 would be warmer.&nbsp; Across the northern half of Georgia, the average daily maximum temperatures were around the fifth percentile, depending on location. <br /><br />The winter as a whole was very wet across the state, especially in December. In January and February, south Georgia was abnormally wet. However, rainfall for January and February across the northern half of the state was near normal to slightly below normal.<br /><br />Because of the cold temperatures, heating demand for the winter was much higher than normal.<br /><br />Across north Georgia, heating demand for Athens was 20 percent above normal. Atlanta was 22 percent above normal. Compared to last winter, heating demand in Athens was 32 percent higher and in Atlanta 36 percent higher.<br /><br />The heating demand is based on heating degree days, which reflects the amount of energy needed to heat a building to a comfortable level considering the daily outside temperature.<br /><br />In middle Georgia, heating demand for this winter was 32 percent above normal in Columbus, 23 percent above normal in Macon and 19 percent above normal in Augusta. Compared to last winter, heating demand in Columbus was 42 percent higher, 42 percent higher in Macon and 40 percent higher in Augusta.<br /><br />Along the Georgia coast, heating demand for this past winter was 15 percent above normal in Savannah and 24 percent above normal in Brunswick. Compared to last year, heating demand in Savannah was 35 percent higher and 46 percent higher in Brunswick.<br /><br />Alma's heating demand for this past winter as 40 percent higher than normal and 38 percent higher than last year. <br /><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/winter-break-the-worst-should.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/winter-break-the-worst-should.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter Georgia 30-day outlook 90-day outlook weather climate Atlanta Old Man Winter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:44:08 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Small distances huge differences in snow</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Just no way the current limitations of weather forecasting can pin point such sharp changes in snow." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_snowfall20100302.jpg" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="330" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Just no way the current limitations of weather forecasting can pin point such sharp changes in snow.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">NWSFO Peachtree City, GA</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
Just not possible given the current state of the art of weather
forecasting to nail down such a tight gradient between a little, a lot
and none. Not only did small horizontal distances make a big
difference, small differences in elevation made huge differences,
proving what we talked about was right--how it was just a thousand feet
and a few degrees that would separate Atlanta from mostly wet or mostly
white. Reports have come in that the top of Kennesaw and Sweat
Mountains in Cobb County had 5-6 inches of snow just some extra 400-600
feet higher. Atlanta has a top 5 snowy winter, from the National
Weather Service Peachtree City:</p>
<p>
Snow in Georgia<br />
March 2, 2010<br />
<br />
An upper level disturbance traversing the western portion of the United
States February 28 and March 1, 2010 helped to develop a surface low
along the Texas coast on March 1. This surface low pressure system
tracked along the Gulf coast and advected moisture ahead of the system
into Georgia from both the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. By
Tuesday, March 2, the surface low moved across southern Georgia and the
Florida panhandle and by that afternoon, had moved into the Atlantic
Ocean along the Carolina coast. This system brought both rain and snow
to the state. Precipitation started as rain and began moving into
western Georgia just before midnight on March 2. During the morning
hours on March 2 the precipitation continued moving across the state
and changed to snow across north Georgia. The snow proceeded to change
back to rain during the afternoon and ended across eastern Georgia late
in the evening. Snowfall amounts averaged from 2 to 4 inches across
north Georgia. However, higher values were reported across northeast
Georgia with reports of 9.0 inches in Union county.<br />
<br />
* Preliminary snowfall totals across north &amp; central Georgia...<br />
<br />
For the 2009-10 season, all four climate stations rank in the top 10
for highest snowfall amounts. The 1.1 inches of snow reported in
Atlanta on March 2, 2010 brings the current snowfall total to 5.3
inches for the season. This ranks number five for the highest seasonal
(July 1 to June 30) snowfall totals in Atlanta. Athens received 5.0
inches of snow this year, ranking number ten for highest snowfall
totals for the area. Macon tied 1939-40 and 1976-77 for the fifth
highest snowfall this season with 3.0 inches received this season to
date. Two inches of snow has fallen in Columbus this season, tying with
the 1978-79 and 1981-82 seasons for third highest snowfall.</p>
<p>
The Outlook for March is for a winter lull for a week or more, but Old
Man Winter may be on break but not on summer vacation until April.
MARCH OUTLOOK: is for precipitation to be normal to above-normal with
temperatures cooler than normal on average.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/small-distance-huge-difference.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/small-distance-huge-difference.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">snow winter storm Atlanta Georgia 30 day outlook</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:14:21 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Snow and ice prove costly in Georgia this winter</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 290px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Costly winter for cities and states like Atlanta, Georgia" src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/New_snow_truck2.jpg" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="210" width="280" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Costly winter for cities and states like Atlanta, Georgia</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">Stock photo</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
Cities and states across the country are having budget woes worsened by
Old Man Winter. Atlanta has had 3 snow/ice systems of note this season
compared to many winters that go with nary a flake. <br />
<br />
After being swamped with snow just a few weeks ago, the Northeast got
clobbered by the storm dubbed the "Snowicane,"&nbsp; caused powerful winds,
immobilizing snow, whiteouts, horizontal rain and flooding and beach erosion. Now yet another wind rain and snow making is hitting the
region from the Carolina's Northward today. Chicago is having a rare 52
inch plus winter 94% above-normal! Not only does this kind of extreme weather cause
hazardous driving conditions, it also cost millions of dollars in snow
removal costs and other damages.<br />
<br />
In New York, for example, it costs the city an estimated $1 million per
inch to plow the snow. And Planalytics, a Pennsylvania based firm that
specializes in business-related weather forecasting, estimates the
wintry messes in February topped $100 million a day during the worst
weather when you add up overtime expenses, reduced productivity and
lost sales. Many cities across the country have used up their
snow-removal budgets and then some. Atlanta has had 5 inches of snow
compared to the 30-year average of 2 inches. Georgia DOT is having to
dig into road maintenance funds to cover salting and sanding operations
with 4-8 inches having fallen in the North Georgia Mountains with
yesterdays storm, and 1-4 inches fell from the Airport to the North
Suburbs. Officially at Hartsfield Airport 5.3 inches of snow has fallen
this season and the state Department of Transportation has spent almost
5 million dollars fighting snow and ice this winter. That is about a million per inch.<br />
<br />
But while some companies are flaking out when it snows, some stocks in
particular are poised to cash in big-time because of this winter's
extreme weather and may cash-in on the clean-up and repair. Old man winter's stock is sure up this year, maybe some others will follow.<br /></p>
<p>
Atlanta based Home Depot (HD) has about 2,300 retail stores in the
U.S., and is likely to be the first destination for homeowners looking
to fix burst pipes, mend fallen gutters or tend to other havoc
inflicted by Old Man Winter.<br />
<br />
HD made a splash recently with a fantastic Q4 earnings report. A 1.2%
jump in same-store sales for the period helped the company trounce Wall
Street estimates of 17 cents per share with actual profits of 24 cents
per share. Do-it-yourself repairs in the wake of the winter storms are
sure to pad Home Depot's bottom line for the current quarter.</p>
<p>
As one of North America's largest roofing materials distributors,
Beacon Roofing Supply (BECN) operates 175 branches throughout the U.S.
and Canada. Besides roofing products, the company also manufactures
related materials, such as siding, windows and waterproofing systems --
products that are sure to be in high demand after the current round of
winter weather.<br />
<br />
In its fiscal first-quarter earnings report released in February, BECN
did show signs of tough times with a 20% decline in sales
year-over-year. However, residential roofing sales were up against
strong comparisons to the previous year where Hurricane Ike literally
drove sales through the roof in Texas. This shows how weather patterns
can affect Beacon Roofing's results, so the stock should cash in after
the storms of February.</p>
<p>
Compass Minerals (CMP) is a leading chemical company that specializes
in fertilizers and salts. While it's clearly not time to be watering
the garden, Kansas-based CMP is seeing brisk business from its deicing
and salt products thanks to the wintry weather.<br />
<br />
Compass has grown its earnings per share dramatically across the last
few quarters and is looking to share more of those profits with
shareholders. On Feb. 8, CMP raised its quarterly dividend by 10% 39
cents per share, payable March 15 to shareholders of record as of March
1. This stock is going strong right now and should see continued
success from the winter weather.</p>
<p>
Ford (F) may not sound like a winter-weather stock, but the company
makes internal combustion engines for far more than just Mustangs and
F-150s. The fact is that Ford remains one of the largest engine
suppliers for top privately held generator companies like Generac and
Kohler.<br />
<br />
Ford is a great stock to buy right now for a number of reasons -- it's
gobbling up market share from bankrupt GM and Chrysler and is
benefiting from uncertainty over Toyota (TM) vehicles in the wake of
the recent recalls. The generator angle provides just one more reason
to like Ford stock right now.</p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/snow-and-ice-prove-costly-in-g.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/snow-and-ice-prove-costly-in-g.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Atlanta Georgia snow ice GDOT stocks</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:53:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Everyone agrees on one thing, this one defines threading the needle</title>
            <description><![CDATA[
<!-- no ratings for this article -->
                            
                           
                            
                           
           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Area in question for snow threat." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_day2.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="225" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Area in question for snow threat.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">NWS/HPC/NOAA</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
First some thoughts from the NWS:<br />
<br />
SPECIAL WEATHER STATEMENT<br />
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BIRMINGHAM AL<br />
1009 PM CST SUN FEB 28 2010<br />
<br />
ALZ011&gt;015-017&gt;038-011400-<br />
BIBB-BLOUNT-CALHOUN-CHAMBERS-CHEROKEE-CHILTON-CLAY-CLEBURNE-COOSA-<br />
ETOWAH-FAYETTE-GREENE-HALE-JEFFERSON-LAMAR-MARION-PERRY-PICKENS-<br />
RANDOLPH-SHELBY-ST CLAIR-SUMTER-TALLADEGA-TALLAPOOSA-TUSCALOOSA-<br />
WALKER-WINSTON-<br />
1009 PM CST SUN FEB 28 2010<br />
<br />
...WINTER PRECIPITATION POSSIBLE MONDAY NIGHT INTO TUESDAY...<br />
<br />
A STRENGTHENING LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM WILL CROSS THE NORTHERN GULF<br />
OF MEXICO MONDAY AND MOVE INTO NORTHERN FLORIDA BY TUESDAY AFTERNOON.<br />
AHEAD OF THIS SYSTEM...MOISTURE WILL SPREAD INTO CENTRAL ALABAMA<br />
MONDAY AFTERNOON RESULTING IN WIDESPREAD RAINFALL. COLDER AIR WILL<br />
FILTER INTO THE AREA MONDAY NIGHT FROM THE NORTHWEST...RESULTING<br />
IN THE POSSIBILITY OF WINTER WEATHER.<br />
<br />
AT THIS TIME...RAIN IS EXPECTED TO MIX WITH OR TRANSITION TO SNOW<br />
STARTING EARLY TUESDAY MORNING...AND THEN CONTINUE THROUGH THE<br />
DAY ON TUESDAY...EVENTUALLY ENDING FROM WEST TO EAST TUESDAY<br />
AFTERNOON. THE BEST CHANCE FOR SNOW IS ALONG AND NORTH OF A LINE FROM<br />
EUTAW...TO CLANTON...TO ROANOKE.<br />
<br />
THE CURRENT FORECAST IS FOR ONE INCH OR LESS OF SNOW IN THESE AREAS.<br />
HOWEVER...THIS FORECAST IS BASED ON TEMPERATURES STAYING JUST WARM<br />
ENOUGH SO THAT MOST OF THE SNOW THAT DOES FALL WILL QUICKLY MELT.<br />
HOWEVER...IT WOULD TAKE A TEMPERATURE DROP OF JUST 2 OR 3 DEGREES TO<br />
CAUSE THESE AMOUNTS TO INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY.<br />
<br />
EVEN AT THIS RELATIVELY LATE JUNCTURE...THERE IS STILL CONSIDERABLE<br />
UNCERTAINTY IN THE FORECAST. MINOR CHANGES IN THE STORM TRACK AND<br />
INTENSITY COULD HAVE A CORRESPONDING MAJOR IMPACT ON THE POSSIBILITY<br />
OF WINTER PRECIPITATION. THE RAIN/SNOW TRANSITION LINE AND<br />
ACCUMULATION POTENTIAL WILL LIKELY NEED TO BE REFINED WITH FUTURE<br />
FORECASTS. CENTRAL ALABAMA SHOULD STAY TUNED FOR UPDATES ON THIS<br />
DEVELOPING WINTER WEATHER SITUATION.<br />
<br />
SPECIAL WEATHER STATEMENT<br />
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA<br />
353 AM EST MON MAR 1 2010<br />
<br />
GAZ001&gt;009-011&gt;016-019&gt;025-027-030&gt;035-041&gt;045-012100-<br />
DADE-WALKER-CATOOSA-WHITFIELD-MURRAY-FANNIN-GILMER-UNION-TOWNS-<br />
CHATTOOGA-GORDON-PICKENS-DAWSON-LUMPKIN-WHITE-FLOYD-BARTOW-<br />
CHEROKEE-FORSYTH-HALL-BANKS-JACKSON-MADISON-POLK-PAULDING-COBB-<br />
NORTH FULTON-GWINNETT-BARROW-HARALSON-CARROLL-DOUGLAS-<br />
SOUTH FULTON-DEKALB-<br />
353 AM EST MON MAR 1 2010<br />
<br />
...WINTRY PRECIPITATION EXPECTED ACROSS MOST OF NORTH GEORGIA<br />
TONIGHT THROUGH TUESDAY NIGHT...<br />
<br />
A STORM SYSTEM DEVELOPING OVER TEXAS WILL MOVE EAST ACROSS THE<br />
NORTHERN GULF OF MEXICO TODAY. THIS LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM WILL BEGIN<br />
TO SPREAD PRECIPITATION ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST TONIGHT.<br />
<br />
AT THIS TIME...IT APPEARS THAT PRECIPITATION WILL BEGIN AS RAIN<br />
ACROSS MOST OF THE AREA...POSSIBLY MIXING WITH SNOW IN THE MOUNTAINS<br />
AT THE ONSET.<br />
<br />
TEMPERATURES ON TUESDAY WILL WARM INTO THE UPPER 30S ACROSS MOST<br />
OF NORTH GEORGIA...THOUGH THE MOUNTAINS WILL LIKELY REMAIN IN THE<br />
LOW TO MID 30S. THE MOST PRECIPITATION WILL FALL IN CENTRAL<br />
GEORGIA IN THE FORM OF ALL RAIN. ACROSS NORTH GEORGIA...<br />
PRECIPITATION ON TUESDAY IS EXPECTED TO BE A MIX OF SNOW AND<br />
RAIN...THOUGH BECAUSE OF THE WARM SURFACE TEMPERATURES THE SNOW<br />
SHOULD MELT AS IT REACHES THE GROUND ON TUESDAY. THE HIGHER<br />
ELEVATIONS OF THE MOUNTAINS...HOWEVER...WILL LIKELY SEE ALL SNOW<br />
AND SOME ACCUMULATIONS DURING THE DAY.<br />
<br />
TEMPERATURES WILL DROP TO NEAR OR JUST BELOW FREEZING ACROSS MOST<br />
OF NORTH GEORGIA TUESDAY NIGHT...ALLOWING ANY MIXTURE TO CHANGE<br />
OVER TO ALL SNOW WITH POSSIBLY SOME BRIEF LIGHT ACCUMULATIONS...<br />
MAINLY NORTH OF THE INTERSTATES 20 AND 85 CORRIDORS...BEFORE THE<br />
SYSTEM EXITS.<br />
<br />
ANY SNOW THAT MANAGES TO STICK WILL GENERALLY AMOUNT TO LESS THAN<br />
A HALF INCH ACROSS MOST OF NORTH GEORGIA...MAINLY NORTH OF A LINE<br />
FROM CARROLLTON TO ATLANTA TO JEFFERSON. IN THE MOUNTAINS...<br />
ESPECIALLY AT HIGHER ELEVATIONS ABOVE 1500 FEET...AN INCH OR TWO<br />
MAY BE POSSIBLE.<br />
<br />
THERE IS STILL SOME UNCERTAINTY WITH THIS SYSTEM. SMALL<br />
ADJUSTMENTS IN THE STORM TRACK MAY MAKE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN<br />
TEMPERATURES...AND THUS IN THE POTENTIAL SNOWFALL ACCUMULATIONS.<br />
RESIDENTS OF NORTH GEORGIA ARE URGED TO MONITOR FURTHER UPDATES.<br />
<br />
Meteorologist Coleman at Huntsville NASA Center:<br />
<br />
this is one of the most difficult forecasts we've seen in a while. An<br />
upper-level system will move out of Texas today and help develop a low<br />
pressure area in the northern Gulf. This low will be in the Florida<br />
panhandle by midnight tonight, and likely strengthen as it moves<br />
northeast. And, temperatures at 850 mb (the "critical level", near<br />
4-5,000 feet, that typically is the rain/snow line) are below freezing.<br />
As an old friend said, "a storm to be proud of." But, despite the<br />
almost perfect dynamic setup for snow, there are some obstacles that<br />
could limit, or even prevent, significant accumulation of snow in<br />
Alabama. <br />
<br />
All 5 of the models we often look at, the GFS, NAM, Canadian, European,
and UKMET show an area of precipitation moving across central and south
Alabama tonight and tomorrow. One thing that makes the forecast
difficult is precipitation amount. There will be large differences in
precipitation totals over short distances from north-to-south with this
storm...one spot along I-65 will get 0.5″ of liquid equivalent
precipitation, while another spot 50 miles up the road could get almost
nothing. The GFS says BHM will get about 6″ of snow, and the NAM says
we will get none. The exact track of a low is hard to pin down even
this close to the event, and yet with this one it is very important.<br />
<br />
The other challenge is the low-level temperature field. It will be cold
enough aloft at Birmingham, Tuscaloosa, and Anniston for the
precipitation to fall as snow, at least aloft. However, the models
indicate that temperatures will climb to near 50 today, and the melting
of the falling snow (causes cooling) will not be enough to overcome the
warm temperatures we build up today. The heavier the precipitation, the
colder.<br />
<br />
The bottom line is that confidence in the forecast is still low for an
event only 24 hours away. However, rain is already moving across Texas,
and high clouds are moving into Alabama this morning. The key thing may
be amount of sunshine and warming today. If it stays below 45, snow
becomes more likely. It appears to me that it will be difficult for
there to be no precipitation in BHM, or even in Cullman, with a system
of this strength. So, rain will likely begin tonight, and slowly mix
with and change over to snow by Tuesday morning. If the sun comes out
for several hours and it gets warm today, it will look pretty falling,
but melt quickly and probably not even accumulate, except maybe in
higher elevations. If it stays cold today, there could be a band
between Birmingham and Clanton where up to 3″ of snow falls.<br />
<br />
NWS South Carolina:<br />
<br />
AS THIS POTENTIAL WINTER STORM APPROACHES...CONFIDENCE IN HEAVY SNOW<br />
ONLY MARGINALLY INCREASED WITH THE LATEST MODEL SUITE. THE 00Z GFS<br />
IS STILL THE MOST BULLISH ON COLD AIR AND QPF...PAINTING WARNING<br />
CRITERIA SNOW ACROSS THE ENTIRE THE FA. MEANWHILE...THE<br />
NAM/ECMWF/SREF ARE ALL MUCH DRIER AND A BIT WARMER (DUE TO SLIGHTLY<br />
SLOWER STORM EVOLUTION...AND HENCE LESS DYNAMICAL COOLING THAN THE<br />
GFS. THE 00Z GEM HAS COME IN CLOSE TO THE GFS ON QPF/SNOW AMTS (AND<br />
IS EVEN A LITTLE FASTER ON PRECIP ONSET AHD OF THE SYS. ALSO...THE<br />
CIPS ANALOG OF 25 MAR 1983...WHICH PRODUCED A SWATH OF 6-12" OF SNOW<br />
ALONG THE I-85 CORRIDOR ONLY SEEMS TO BE STANDING OUT MORE WITH EACH<br />
GFS RUN. SO WITH THIS ALL TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT...FEEL THAT THERE IS<br />
ABOUT A 50% CHC OF WARNING CRITERIA SNOW IN A SWATH SOMEWHERE IN THE<br />
FA ON TUESDAY. SO WILL ISSUE A WINTER STORM WATCH FOR ALL COUNTIES<br />
SOUTH OF I-40. BASED ON THE CURRENT STORM TRACK...A GFS RA/SN LINE<br />
ALONG SRN FRINGE OF THE FA...AND HPC QPF (WITH 10:1 SLR)...THE<br />
CURRENT FCST IS FOR 2-4" SNOW ACCUM FROM THE SW NC MTNS...ALONG THE<br />
I-85 CORRIDOR OF THE UPSTATE...TO THE CHARLOTTE METRO AREA. THIS IS<br />
BY NO MEANS SET IN STONE. IN FACT...THERE IS STILL A CHC THAT THE<br />
NAM COULD BE CLOSER TO REALITY...AND A WARM SFC LAYER BASICALLY<br />
PRECLUDES ANY SNOW ACCUM AT ALL.<br />
<br />
MY THOUGHTS (as heard on the radio the past 48 hours):<br />
<br />
So there you have it, a piece of cake! ;)&nbsp; </p>
<p>
As a side note history tells us snow can fall with surface temps as
high as 41 proof that it's how "deep" the above 32 air is that matters
in the end, deep = rain shallow = snow.<br />
<br />
We have to watch this one closely and not let our guard down yet. While
more rain or melted snow is favored by me now as the safer forecast, it
has potential to be a big snow maker, so it should not be dismissed out
of hand. Only a couple degrees C&nbsp; and about 40 miles in storm track
separate ATL from a cold rain with some melting snow, and a significant
wet snow storm Tuesday. So obviously a lot can change at the last
minute. This is probably as close a call as last March 1st and an
infamous Atlanta storm back in March of 1983. In fact, IF the computers
were showing the lowest 1-2,000 feet of atmosphere just 2 degrees or
so cooler I'd be forecasting 1-4 inches for much of the metro. So with
only 2 degrees or so between a cold wet day and potential trouble this
could go down to the wire. How fast precip falls and just small changes
in track will mean a world of difference in the end.</p>
<p>
Right now the upper and middle atmosphere (remember our top-down
approach homework quiz last week) are projected to be cold enough for
all snow. But the models show the boundary layer surface to 1,000 feet
or so to be just warm enough to melt a lot of it, producing a rain mix
or changeover. If the storm gets strong enough to generate heavy precip
fall rates and strong energy lifting dynamics overhead, it would drag
down the colder air aloft bringing moderate to heavy snow to much of
the area. It looks like a very fine line between the <i>mostly&nbsp;</i> rain look
we have in the forecast now OR more snow. A line I'll be tracking on
the radio all day and tomorrow.</p>
<p>
As of now it looks like <u>mostly </u>rain for most of Atlanta with some
nuisance snow late tonight and tomorrow. But separating us from very wet or very white is just those two three degrees and
thousand feet or so. The plain hard truth is our computer models and
data net just dont have fine enough details to confidently resolve that
fine a line. So while more rain than snow is the call at this writing,
it could just as easily go the other way! And we may not know until the
event is taking place having to nowcast the rain/snow line and amounts
as we go or give a last second all clear.&nbsp; This is quite unlike our
mid-Feb snow when I was very confident there would be snow, the
forecast challenge was only the amount of snow. This time moisture is no
question, its the vertical temperature profile that's in question.</p>
<p>
MODEL OUTPUT ONLY NOT A FORECAST:</p>
<p>
The recent average of the best numerical variants is a liquid
equivalent of 0.60 so a good soaking if its all rain. IF that was ALL
snow using the standard 10:1 conversion ratio it would be 6 inches of
snow.</p>
<p>
The mean of the last 10 model runs or so, note these include a range from <strong>zero</strong> snow to an outrageous 11:</p>
<p>
Again these are averages of snow <em>IF </em>all snow</p>
<p>
ECMWF 3.5</p>
<p>
GFS 3.5</p>
<p>
JMA 3</p>
<p>
REGEM/GGEM 4.65</p>
<p>
NOGAPS 4.5</p>
<p>
NAM/DEGEX 5.1</p><p>The slightest change can alter everything, a million things need to go right for snow just one wrong for no.&nbsp; <u>Usually</u> when you need a system to "create" its own cold air-- it <b>fails</b> to happen, but when it does happen, it makes for lollipop isolated dumpings of wet flakes.<br /></p><p>Since anything I can write hear I will say on the radio tune-in to News Talk 750 WSB AM or click listen live or 5-day forecast at wsbradio.com for the latest update.<br /></p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
<p>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</p>
 


<div class="slideshowtopper"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1046678" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()">Models agree on storm but not on temps</a> </div>
<div class="slideshowsides" align="center"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1046678" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"><img src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/slideshows/Screen_shot_2010_02_28_at_12.30.56_PM.png" alt="Models agree on storm but not on temps" border="0" /></a>
</div>

<div style="float: left; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); width: 380px;">Just 2 of over two dozen models but none agree on everything.</div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/everyone-agrees-on-one-thing-t.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/03/everyone-agrees-on-one-thing-t.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter weather Atlanta Georgia models upper air data net numerical equations rain snow</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:10:36 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Still lacking clarity see the slide show that tells the tale</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Energy jumps from Desert Southwest and Southern Plains to cause Gulf cyclogenesis." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_lowtrack.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="225" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Energy jumps from Desert Southwest and Southern Plains to cause Gulf cyclogenesis.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">NWS/NCEP/HPC</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
As you will see if you look at the slide show maps at examiner.com/Atlanta, just using two of
the 28 or so models there is still wide disparity between the various
equations output.&nbsp; I am giving PRELIMINARY demarcation of where snow
accumulation is most likely as it looks <em>right now </em>but
future data will no doubt change. At least some snowflakes will
probably be seen in most if not all of the Atlanta metro area mixed
with or starting as rain. However, as of this writing the <strong>highest odds </strong>for
1-3 inches accumulation mainly on grassy areas etc. appears to be along
and North of a Line from around Calhoun GA to Athens. Keep in mind that
this is a guidepost line, not a line drawn in the sand. There is no
magic wall in the sky :) and in the real world the "line" is really a
transition <em>zone </em>that is often 15-30 miles either side of the line estimate.</p>
<p>
The big questions remain the same with the system. Will the two jet
stream energy bundles phase together and if so where and how soon?
Where will the cyclone track what will its path be? How much moisture
will be drawn into the system? Will the surface or near-surface temps
ever cool enough to allow snow flakes in the clouds to make it to the
ground before melting?&nbsp; If you take the composite average of all the
main models over the past few days they average out for a good part of
Atlanta or at least the North and East suburbs as 3 inches <strong>IF </strong>it all falls as snow-- which seems iffy at this point. Rain and melting would seem likely to reduce <em>whatever </em>amount of snowflakes fall. In order to get snow we need a thousand things to go right, to be missed only one to go wrong.</p>
<p>
Inevitably the weather keeps changing and so therefore must forecasts.
I don't know if I'll have time to post anymore so remember to click on
5-day forecast at wsbradio.com or click LISTEN LIVE at wsbradio.com OR
turn your radio on. It's radio-active. :)</p>
 


<div class="slideshowtopper"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1044607" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()">Two of a couple dozens or more models</a> </div>
<div class="slideshowsides" align="center"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1044607" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"><img src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/slideshows/Screen_shot_2010_02_28_at_7.26.20_AM.png" alt="Two of a couple dozens or more models" border="0" /></a>
</div>

<div style="float: left; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); width: 380px;">Notice the lack of agreement and that projections change every 6 hours.</div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/still-lacking-clarity-see-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/still-lacking-clarity-see-the.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter storm GFS NAM computer model guidance rain snow equations</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:00:37 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>See the slide show where I update maps.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Clearly with model output ranging from just rain, or from <b>half an inch snow</b> <i>to </i>almost 8 inches those descrpancies can not be turned into a forecast at this time distance in the future. There will be a storm, but the models are having trouble calculating the <u>interaction</u> (phase or no phase) between two separate energy fields: one embedded in the Polar Jet Stream coming from the Northwest and the other embedded in the Sub Tropical Jet Stream coming from the Pacific Ocean.<br /><br />It's been my experience that when the weather depends on phasing of two systems the forecasting is tougher than usual and may go down to the wire. There is a 100% chance of a storm system, but how it will play out is far from clear. I continue to think it's a bigger deal for SC/NC/VA Northward, but I'll let future data decide if I should change my mind.<br /><br />To learn more and see the maps as things stand now go to examiner.com/Atlanta and see the slide show. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner">Just a click away right here.</a> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/see-the-slide-show-where-i-upd.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/see-the-slide-show-where-i-upd.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">models winter storm jet stream</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:50:03 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>No reason to change previous thinking on next week yet</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner">Maps and write-up here see slide show.</a><a href="http://the%20shortwave%20with%20a%20strong%20neg%20ht%20anomaly%20moving%20across%20tx%20and%20the%20gulf%20coast%20will%20induce%20hvy%20rains%20along%20the%20gulf%20coast%20mon%20and%20tues%20and%20ewd%20across%20fl%20into%20ga%20and%20sc.%20deep%20trof%20with%20well%20below%20normal%20hts/MID/LOW%20LEVEL%20TEMPS%20APPEAR%20LIKELY%20TO%20BRING%20SNOW%20ACROSS%20THE%20NRN%20EDGE%20OF%20THE%20PCPN%20SHIELD%20ACROSS%20NRN%20AL/GA/SRN%20AND%20ERN%20TN.%20AS%20THE%20TROF%20TAKES%20A%20MORE%20NEG%20TILTED%20ORIENTATION%20HEAVIER%20SNOW%20FALL%20IS%20POSSIBLE%20ACROSS%20THE%20MTNS%20OF%20SC/NC/SWRN%20VA%20AND%20SRN%20WV.%20HVY%20COASTAL%20RAINS%20AND%20ONSHORE%20GALE%20FORCE%20WINDS%20WITH%20HIGH%20SURF%20AND%20BEACH%20EROSION/COASTAL%20FLOODING%20THREAT%20CAN%20BE%20EXPECTED%20TUES%20INTO%20THURSDAY%20ALONG%20THE%20SOUTHEASTERN%20SEABOARD.%20AS%20THE%20MOVES%20UP%20EWD%20ALONG%20THE%20COAST%20LOW%20DEEPENS%20LOWERING%201000-500%20MB%20THICKNESS%20VALUES%20AND%20H850%20TEMPS%20IMPLY%20A%20SIG%20SNOW%20VERY%20POSSIBLY%20HVY%20SNOW%20THREAT%20FROM%20THE%20NC%20MTNS%20AND%20FOOTHILLS%20INTO%20THE%20PIEDMONT%20AND%20NEWD%20INTO%20THE%20LOWER%20VA%20PIEDMONT/TIDEWATER%20AREAS%20OF%20VA%20AND%20POSSIBLY%20LOWER%20SRN%20MD%20AND%20LOWER%20DELMARVA.%20STRONG%20N-NE%20WINDS%20WILL%20EXTEND%20WELL%20FROM%20THE%20MID%20ATLC%20REGION%20NWD%20ALONG%20THE%20NEW%20ENG%20COAST.%20DETAILS%20OF%20PCPN%20TYPE/AMOUNTS%20AND%20COVERAGE%20WILL%20BECOME%20BETTER%20DEFINED%20AS%20THE%20EVENT%20CLOSES%20TO%20WITHIN%20A%2072%20HR%20OR%20LESS%20TIMEFRAME.">&nbsp;</a> <div><br /></div><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/no-reason-to-change-previous-t-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/no-reason-to-change-previous-t-1.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Full moon winter storm potential models snow Atlanta Georgia jet stream energy rain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:55:00 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>GFS3 model odd-man out but no gurantees</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I'll just cut and paste from what I put on my Atlanta Weather Examiner.com blog this morning:<br /><br />
<!-- no ratings for this article -->
                            
                           
                            
                           
           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Preliminary map for Tuesday Morning, slightly slower and further South than yesterdays expectation" src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_9lhwbgpre.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="225" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Preliminary map for Tuesday Morning, slightly slower and further South than yesterdays expectation</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">HPC/NOAA/NWS</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
VALID 12Z MON MAR 01 2010 - 12Z THU MAR 04 2010</p>
<p>
GFS3 out to lunch on next week weather threat in Gulf Coast states to
VA, but way too soon to tell who will gets snow vs. rain, and how much
of each will fall or where Tuesday-Wednesday. Storm could be a swing
and a miss and North Georgia gets little or nothing at all, OR
significant snow is either North of Georgia or SOUTH of Atlanta.</p>
<p>
Here is some model output for the system next week for Atlanta liquid equivalent as of this writing:</p>
<p>
Euro ENS 0.50-0.75<br />
Euro OP .25-.50</p>
<p>
JMA .10-.25</p>
<p>
DEGEX 0.0</p>
<p>
NOGAPS .25-.50</p>
<p>
CMC .10-.25</p>
<p>
GFS 0.0</p>
<p>
UKMET shows storm no QPF available</p>
<p>
<br />
USED THE 00Z/25 ECMWF TO UPDATE THE PRELIMINARY FRONTS AND<br />
PRESSURES FOR DAYS 3-6 ACROSS THE NATION...WITH A MODEST<br />
INCORPORATION OF THE ECENS MEAN DAY 7 TO MITIGATE THE UNCERTAINTY<br />
IN SYNOPTIC DETAILS INHERENT TO THAT TIME RANGE. FOR THE SOUTH<br />
AND EAST...THE MAJOR CONCERN IS THE WAVE THE MODELS TRACK ACROSS<br />
THE GULF OF MEXICO...AND THEN OVER THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. THIS<br />
WINTER SEASON HAS SEEN WAVE AFTER WAVE CROSS THE GULF OR DEEP<br />
SOUTH...AND THEN TURN EITHER SUBTLY OR SHARPLY UP THE EASTERN<br />
SEABOARD. IN MOST CASES...THE GLOBAL NUMERICAL MODELS HAVE BEEN<br />
SHY ABOUT LIFTING THESE SYSTEMS FAR ENOUGH NORTH SEVERAL DAYS<br />
OUT...WITH AN INEVITABLE CREEP NORTHWARD TOWARD CAPE HATTERAS WITH<br />
TIME. THE SNOWFALL OVER MUCH OF THE SOUTHEAST A COUPLE WEEKS AGO<br />
IS AN EXAMPLE OF SUCH A CASE...WITH MUCH OF THE GUIDANCE NOT<br />
GIVING THE REGION ITS DUE UNTIL A MERE 36 HOURS FROM IMPACT. TOOK<br />
THE CUE FOR THIS FORECAST...AND USED THE DETERMINISTIC<br />
ECMWF...WHICH TRACKED CLOSEST TO THE COAST DAY 6. THIS MODEL HAS<br />
THE SUPPORT OF THE GEM GLOBAL...AS WELL AS THE ENSEMBLE GUIDANCE<br />
FROM BOTH THE EUROPEAN AND CANADIAN CENTERS. THE GFS AND ITS<br />
ATTENDANT ENSEMBLE PACKAGE LOOKED FLAT BASED ON THE EXPERIENCE OF<br />
THIS SEASON. THE WEST COAST WILL CONTINUE TO BE AT THE SPLITTING<br />
POINT OF WAVES COMING IN FROM THE PACIFIC...WITH A COUPLE INTENSE<br />
COLD MARITIME POLAR VORTICES SLATED FOR THE NORTHWEST DURING THE<br />
SECOND HALF OF THE PERIOD. THE MIDDLE OF THE NATION WILL BE UNDER<br />
THE INFLUENCE OF A CONTINUAL FEED OF CONTINENTAL POLAR AIR...THIS<br />
REGIONS LOT IN LIFE IN THE TENACIOUS BLOCKING REGIME OF THE WINTER<br />
OF 09-10.</p>
<p>
THERE IS MUCH LESS AGREEMENT ON THE POTENTIAL FOR HEAVY SNOW IN THE
LOWER MISSISSIPPI AND LOWER TENNESSEE VALLEYS FOR MONDAY INTO TUESDAY.
THE PAST SEVERAL CYCLES OF THE GFS HAVE TAKEN THE FORECAST STORM FROM
THE SOUTHERN PLAINS INTO THE CENTRAL/SOUTHERN GULF OF MEXICO WITH A
DRIER FORECAST FOR THIS REGION. TODAY'S 00Z AND 12Z CMC AND ECWMF
OPERATIONAL RUNS FOLLOW A TRACK CLOSER TO THE NORTHERN GULF AND BRING
PRECIPITATION INTO THESE AREAS. HOWEVER, TODAY'S OPERATIONAL ECMWF
THERMAL PROFILES WOULD SUPPORT A MIX OF RAIN/SNOW, WITH CMC'S MORE
SUPPORTIVE OF AN ACCUMULATING SNOWFALL. GIVEN THE INCREASED
UNCERTAINTY, THE AREA OF HEAVY SNOW ACROSS THESE REGIONS WAS REMOVED,
BUT THIS AREA WILL NEED TO BE VERY CAREFULLY MONITORED WITH THE LATEST
MODEL RUNS. IN THE LEAST, IF THE ECMWF AND/OR CMC SOLUTIONS ARE
CORRECT, SLICK ROADS DUE TO A RAIN/SNOW MIX OR ACCUMULATING SNOWS WOULD
BE EXPECTED ACROSS THESE AREAS.<br />
<br />
THERE IS A POTENTIAL THREAT OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS PORTIONS OF
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA ALONG AND AHEAD OF THE SURFACE COLD FRONT
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SYSTEM.<br />
&nbsp;</p>
 


<div class="slideshowtopper"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1036694" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()">Big storm on table from Texas to FL and VA early next week</a> </div>
<div class="slideshowsides" align="center"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1036694" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"><img src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/slideshows/10mhwbgpre.gif" alt="Big storm on table from Texas to FL and VA early next week" border="0" /></a>
</div>

<div style="float: left; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); width: 380px;">But the devil is in the details and the details can't be worked out this far in advance.</div><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/gfs3-model-oddman-out-but-no-g.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/gfs3-model-oddman-out-but-no-g.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">snow Southeast models winter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:27:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Could parts of the Southeast see one last big ticket weather item before Spring?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Light snow falling I-20 Southward as I write this, no big deal won't last wont matter but it's snowflakes.&nbsp; I hope you did the snow/rain quiz. You can google to find those Skew-T diagrams and test your skills after reading the tutorial. For more stories and Olympics weather forecast visit examiner.com/Atlanta and look for my page.<br /><br />Now for the next POTENTIAL big ticket weather item:<br /><br />
<!-- no ratings for this article -->
                            
                           
                            
                           
           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="Preliminary weather map for next Tuesday Morning." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_9mhwbgpre.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="225" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> Preliminary weather map for next Tuesday Morning.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">HPC/NOAA/NWS</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
PRELIMINARY EXTENDED FORECAST DISCUSSION<br />
<br />
VALID 12Z SUN FEB 28 2010 - 12Z WED MAR 03 2010<br />
<br />
...SIGNIFICANT WINTER WEATHER THREAT FOR THE SW/SRN/SE US AND POSSIBLY MID-ATLC NEXT WEEK...<br />
Greatest threat TN NC and VA Northward but may have to shift threat south.<br />
<br />
THE MODELS CONTINUE TO ADVERTISE A RETROGRADING POSITIVE MID-UPPER<br />
LEVEL HEIGHT ANOMALY FROM EASTERN INTO W-CENTRAL CANADA. THIS<br />
SHOULD ALLOW AN AMBIENT CLOSED NORTHEAST VORTEX TO EXIT STAGE<br />
RIGHT OVER THE WEEKEND...YET TRAP SOME MID-LEVEL ENERGY BACK<br />
ACROSS THE MIDWEST NEXT WEEK. REPERCUSSIONS ARE MANY FOR ITS<br />
INTERACTION WITH A NEARLY CLOSED CYCLONE ALOFT/STRONG SHORTWAVE<br />
WHICH SPLITS OUT OF THE EASTERN PACIFIC TROUGH IN A POTENT SRN<br />
STREAM TO NEAR 4 CORNERS BY SUN. THIS ENERGETIC FLOW/SYSTEM THEN<br />
PROGRESSES BODILY/STEADILY EASTWARD OVER THE SOUTHERN TIER OF THE<br />
COUNTRY...WITH QUESTION MARKS WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER OR NOT<br />
DIGGING MIDWEST NRN STREAM ENERGY IS STRONG ENOUGH TO LURE THE<br />
SOUTHERN SYSTEM NORTHWARD OR MERGE WITH IT...AND IF SO HOW FAR<br />
NORTH THE COMBINED SYSTEM COULD MOVE. WITH A TWO DAY TREND<br />
SOMEWHAT TO THE SOUTH NOTED AMONGST THE MULTI-MODEL ENSEMBLE<br />
MEMBERS...FELT THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION WAS TO GO IN THE MIDDLE<br />
OF THE ENSEMBLE CLUSTERING RATHER THAN THE NORTHERN SIDE<br />
CONSIDERING CONTINUITY. THIS SOLUTION ADVERTISES A SNOWSTORM<br />
THREAT ACROSS THE SRN ROCKY STATES SUN OUT ACROSS THE SRN THEN<br />
SERN US/LOWER MID-ATLANTIC MONDAY INTO WEDNESDAY NEXT WEEK AS A<br />
DECENT CLUSTER OF ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEMBERS CLOSE OFF A VORTEX AT 500<br />
HPA WITH HEIGHTS BELOW 5400 METERS INTO THE SOUTH. HOWEVER...A<br />
CLUSTER OF GEFS/CANADIAN MEMBERS ARE LOCATED MORE NORTHWARD OVER<br />
THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES. NEEDLESS TO SAY...SOME UNCERTAINTY<br />
REMAINS CONCERNING THESE IMPORTANT SMALLER SCALE DETAILS AND<br />
INTERACTIONS OF THIS FORECAST. THE UPDATED PRELIM HPC SURFACE<br />
FRONTS/PRESSURE AND 500 MB PROGS MAINTAIN CLOSE HPC CONTINUITY AS<br />
PRIMARILY DERIVED FROM 50-50 BLEND OF SIMILAR 00 UTC<br />
GFS/ECMWF...ALBEIT ADJUSTED SLIGHTLY CLOSER TO THE SE US COAST<br />
INTO NEXT MIDWEEK BASED ON POTENTIAL BEST SHOWN BY ECMWF ENSEMBLE<br />
CLUSTERING. DESPITE UNCERTAINTIES WITH EMBEDDED SYSTEM<br />
DETAILS...LARGER SCALE FLOW DEPICTION FROM THE MODELS AND<br />
ENSEMBLES ARE ACTUALLY QUITE SIMILAR...WITH BELOW NORMAL FORECAST<br />
SPREAD LEADING TO ABOVE AVERAGE FORECASTER CONFIDENCE. THIS<br />
INCLUDES AMPLIFIED NRN STREAM FLOW POTENTIAL...LEAD SRN STREAM<br />
ENERGY OUT FROM SW US THROUGH THE US SRN TIER/GULF OF MEX...AND<br />
SUBSEQUENT RELOADING OF AMPLIFIED ERN PACIFIC TROUGH ENERGY AND<br />
ASSOCIATED RENEWED US W COAST ORGANIZED PCPN POTENTIAL AGAIN BY<br />
DAYS 6/7. ACCORDINGLY...THE MAIN WEATHER SYSTEMS HAVE A HIGHER<br />
THAN NORMAL CHANCE OF DEVELOPING IN A VEIN SIMILAR TO<br />
GUIDANCE...EVEN THOUGH THE FOCUS FOR SIGNIFICANT SENSIBLE WEATHER<br />
IS MORE UNCERTAIN.</p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/could-parts-of-the-southeast-s.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/could-parts-of-the-southeast-s.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">snow flurries Atlanta Georgia snow storm preliminary model discussion</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Homework assignment: rain, snow, sleet, freezing rain quiz</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="It's a very fine line between rain, snow or sleet. Margin of error can be 1% or less.
Skew-T BHM" src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_bhm01291018z.jpg" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="219" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> It's a very fine line between rain, snow or sleet. Margin of error can be 1% or less.
Skew-T BHM</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">National Weather Service Birmingham, AL</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
The Difference Between Rain and Freezing Rain</p>
<p>
<br />
Weather Review - January 29, 2010 from the Birmingham, Alabama National Weather Service Office.<br />
This could just as well apply and does to Atlanta, Georgia or any city in America.<br />
<br />
See the slide show for graphics the first one is the Birmingham LAPS
Sounding at Noon on Friday, January 29, 2010. The second is the
Sounding for the same time for Marion County Alabama.</p>
<p>
<br />
Many times during the winter months, central Alabama finds itself on
the edge of disaster. There are many times when our counties are less
than 100 miles away from having large amounts of winter precipitation,
whether that is ice pellets, snow or even worse...freezing rain. Friday
morning was no different. Portions of NW Alabama, including the Muscle
Shoals area, received freezing rain accumulations Friday morning and
afternoon of Jan 29th. The freezing rain was seen as far south as
Winston and Marion Counties. The question is, why did these two
counties see the freezing rain and the Birmingham area did not? We will
attempt to illustrate why the Birmingham area was spared Friday.</p>
<p>
<br />
The two graphs displayed here are known as Skew-T graphs or
Thermodynamic diagrams. If you are having trouble&nbsp; seeing them visit the examiner.com/Atlanta page for bigger version in slide show. They are a depiction of what the atmospheric
conditions are over a given location. Skew-T graphs are created from
the release of a weather balloon with an attached instrument called a
radiosonde. After release, the radiosonde sends a signal back to our
office that gives us four parameters: environmental temperature, dew
point, atmospheric pressure and wind speed and direction. These two
graphs are actually computer generated in order to help us maintain a
current picture of what's going on in central Alabama. The two green
lines on each graph reflect the environmental or air temperature (green
line furthest to the right) and the dew point temperature (furthest
green line to the left). These two lines can tell meteorologists many
things, such as, the closer they are together, the more moisture that
is present in that layer of the atmosphere. The solid horizontal lines
(white) are pressure levels in the atmosphere. The solid lines running
from bottom left to top right indicated temperature in degrees celsius.</p>
<p>
<br />
So what are these two Skew-Ts telling us about Friday's weather? In the
winter months, forecasters use the Skew-T and a method called "The
Top-Down Approach" in order to determine what type of precipitation is
going to reach the ground. The first graph is a Skew-T over Birmingham
and the second is over northern Marion County, both at noon Friday. In
this method, a forecaster examines three different layers of the
atmosphere.</p>
<p>
For simplification, we have highlighted the three most important temperature lines:<br />
The first layer to analyze is the one above -12 degrees celsius. If the
atmoshpere is saturated (the green lines close together) above -12
degrees celsius, then it is ripe for the growth of snow crystals.
Atmospheric saturation has occured above -12 degrees celsius, so we
already have snow forming.</p>
<p>
<br />
The next layer to analyze is the one just above the surface. If there
is a warm layer of air just off the surface and the temperature in this
layer is warmer than 4 degrees celsius, precipitation will usually fall
in the form of rain. In the case of the atmosphere in Birmingham, the
temperature in the warm layer is approximately 6 degrees celsius. This
means it's too warm to get anything but rain.</p>
<p>
In Marion County, the warm layer temperature is slightly cooler than 4
degrees celsius. This is warm enough for the snow crystals to melt, so
at this point, the snow crystal has turned into a rain droplet, but
depending on what's going on at the surface...there may still be time
for some type of winter precipitation to occur.</p>
<p>
<br />
Finally, we must examine the layer closest to the surface. If the
temperature at the surface at or below freezing, as was the case in
northern Marion County Friday, rain droplets will freeze upon contact
with the ground. This is why freezing rain was seen in northern
portions of the county. With temperatures at 31 to 32 degrees, the rain
droplets froze upon contact with the ground (or the trees or the power
lines).</p>
<p>
<br />
In summary, over both areas, the upper atmosphere was ripe for snow
crystal growth, but over Birmingham, there was a warm enough layer just
above the surface to melt those snow crystals, allowing only rain to
reach the ground. In Marion County, the layer above the surface was
warm enough to melt the snow crystals, and with the temperature right
at or just below freezing at the surface, when the precipitation
reached the ground , it was cold enough to freeze on contact. But if
the forecast for the surface temp was off by just a degree or two (well
within the normal and expected margin of error) there could have been
just rain for everyone or freezing rain, or if a tad colder ANYWHERE in
the atmosphere then sleet.<br />
<br />
Notice just how close a call it was! The lines just barely need to move
for a different outcome. Research has shown that there is a margin of
error of 1% or less in rain/snow/ice forecasts. This is why weather
forecasting is such a difficult job. How would you like to have a
margin of error of 1% or less in your job or personal life?</p>
<p>
Another problem arises with these Skew-T diagrams that come from the
weather balloon releases. The balloons are only released twice a day
around sunrise and sunset. It then takes a couple hours before the
results arrive. Then about 6 hours for the data to process in computers
in time steps forward.</p>
<p>
Any changes in the atmosphere between those times is unknown! On top of
that, the balloons are released at only some 90 or so spots across the
country. 90 tiny points. What the atmosphere is doing inbetween those
points (most of the country) is unknown. There are zero balloons
released over the oceans, none! The earth is more water than land so
most of the atmosphere does not get a thorough measurement for
forecasters to use!&nbsp; This is a major handicap to say the least.
Meteorologists must make due with a tiny fraction of data compared to
the whole.</p>
<p>
And the balloons are not released over every major city nor across a
whole city. In Georgia for example the closest Skew-T diagram generated
from balloon release is way down in Peachtree City well South of the
city and nothing for downtown, the North Suburbs, Athens or the
Mountains!&nbsp; So all those unknowns must be extrapolated, estimated,
approximated in time and space going forward in the future to make a
forecast. Its as if the weatherman is blindfolded with one hand and leg
tied behind them then asked to hit a bullseye with a bow and arrow from
1000 paces in a strong wind.&nbsp; Its a small wonder forecasts are
sometimes wrong, its amazing that against all odds they're often right.</p>
<p>
Now that you've had instruction go ahead and try your hand at it for
the next storm here or anywhere in the country. Have fun, enjoy.</p>
 


<div class="slideshowtopper"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=988230" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()">A very fine line between rain, freezing rain, snow, sleet.</a> </div>
<div class="slideshowsides" align="center"><a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=988230" onclick="NewWindow(this.href,'slideshowwin','970','600','yes', 'yes','center');return false" onfocus="this.blur()"><img src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/slideshows/bhm01291018z.jpg" alt="A very fine line between rain, freezing rain, snow, sleet." border="0" /></a>
</div>

<div style="float: left; color: rgb(255, 255, 255); width: 380px;">You
can be right about the forecast for 99.5% of the atmospheric sounding
but 100% wrong about the forecast weather because off a little in the
profile can equal a different outcome at the surface. Green lines
temp/dew point (moisture) red lines key temps</div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/homework-assignment-rain-snow.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/homework-assignment-rain-snow.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">rain sleet snow freezing rain models thermodynamic diagram Skew-t chart forecasting models upper-air charts</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:12:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Moon phases and the weather coincidence or not?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="The Euro if right implies another rare snow for parts of Dixie before the month ends." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_ECMWFsouthsnow.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="198" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> The Euro if right implies another rare snow for parts of Dixie before the month ends.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">ECMWF</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
You may recall that I posted back on February 3rd about correlations
between moon phases and major weather pattern changes and/or big ticket
storm systems. These seem to occur a few days either side of the New
Moon and the Full Moon. That pattern has worked out well so far this
winter with that Feb 3 post warning about the big ticket event of Feb
12th. The last New Moon Feb 14th saw an historic Southern Snow near it
on the 12th and 15-16th cold blast and snow flurries. The next Full
Moon is February 28th and the next New Moon is March 15th. Lets see if
it works again.</p>
<p>
Early modeling says yes and I've already been talking about it for many
weeks now. As of this writing it looks like it will be a swing and a
miss for Atlanta with any real snow being TN and NC north to New
England. However, the Euro says don't take any part of Georgia off the
table for this yet. Now this is just one operational run of the model
and not a forecast, but if it verifies it implies a snow threat from
I-40 to I-10.</p>
<p>
It also means don't get used to long dry spells and don't expect warm
air to lock in anytime soon as February will end cold. Perhaps that
"New Moon" phase of March 15th will be a pattern shift toward spring at
last, or will it just be another storm?</p>
<p>
This weekend the split flow pattern continues with a zonal flow across
the South allowing temps to moderate as a new storm series begins to
hit the West Coast in CA. As we head toward next weekend that upper low
heads East through Texas and may end up phasing along the East Coast as
a Nor-Easter after sparking low pressure in the Southeastern USA. It
will be preceded and followed by more polar air.</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.examiner.com/examinerslideshow.html?entryid=1017495">See slide show here for more at examiner.com</a></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/moon-phases-and-the-weather-co.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/moon-phases-and-the-weather-co.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">moon phase weather climate snow South Dixie models split flow jet stream GFS3 ECMWF</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:52:18 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Old man winter puts his feet up for a little while</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="file:///Users/kirkmelhuish/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot-1.png" alt="" />           
 
                                        
<div id="hidefrompromo" style="margin: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; float: left; width: 310px;">
                                    
                                
 
<div style="overflow: hidden; font-size: 11px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51);">
                                    
<div align="center">
                                    
<img alt="North American Ensemble Forecast System shows more cold to come." src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_poeabn.gif" style="padding-bottom: 5px;" height="255" width="300" />
</div>
                                  
<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> North American Ensemble Forecast System shows more cold to come.</div>
<div class="new_timestamp" style="font-size: 10px; padding-left: 10px;">Environment Canada</div>
                                    
</div>
                               
                               
 
                                    </div>
<p>
Although some relaxation in the winter chill is on the way for the
Southland, I see no permanent wholesale reversal in the long cold
winter pattern prevalent for much of the United States anytime soon.
And certainly not before late February and probably not until sometime
in March at the earliest.</p>
<p>
Note the brief appearance of a semi-zonal (west-east) jet stream flow
across the lower half of America-- or at least less amplified-- does
not last.&nbsp; In the longer range the stormy active pattern reloads to
some extent according to the European model and most others. The NAEFS
sure shows the high probability of below-normal temps in the medium
range. The stratospheric warming above the North Pole which began in
late January signaled to us the negative AO would return and
strengthen. This supports more cold air and based on past SSW events,
the pattern we've been in should last another 2 weeks.</p><p>For the other maps <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner%7Ey2010m2d16-Death-of-winter-rumors-maybe-premature">Click here for slide show.</a></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/old-man-winter-puts-his-feet-u.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/old-man-winter-puts-his-feet-u.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">El Nino winter models -AO sudden stratospheric warming SSW jet stream cold snow South United States blocking extreme weather</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:26:01 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Not a puppy love, not a boring winter</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I am beginning to wonder when I might get a weekend off or any chance at a personal life. Things are piling up on me because since the big rain storm pattern and flood began back in Sept. its been one weather threat after another and I am 24/7 on the job and nothing in my LIFE is getting done. I hate it.<br /><br />I have no time so I'll post some discussions from elsewhere. My forecast has been updated on this site under 5-day forecast as always its updated daily as needed. This system is similar to the early January system that didn't cause problems until the day after it fell when temps plunged, actual accumulation if you recall was minor and more on grass than highways. Like that system this is not a storm (low pressure) moving through or South of Georgia but instead a strong front dangling down from the low storm center which started up Near Hudson Bay Canada then dropped into the USA from North of North Dakota making it a "Dakota Dasher" or "Manitoba Mauler" if you need to give it a nick-name as it tracks now from Southern MO to the DC area then up to Cape Cod, MA. In all the years I've worked here I can't remember a greater than one inch snow from a cold front but my memories not so great sometimes. And the way this winter has been going nationwide, if there were to be a "first time in memory" I guess this would be the winter for it. So while I am skeptical as of now, that doesn't mean I can't be convinced by later data. As the weather changes so will the forecast up down or completely different, whatever is needed.<br /><br /><pre>MID MS VALLEY TO OH/TN VALLEYS...<br /><br />A VERY DYNAMIC UPPER VORTEX MAKING ITS WAY SOUTHEAST INTO THE<br />REGION THIS MORNING FROM SD WILL MAKE ITS WAY INTO THE LOWER OH<br />VALLEY BEFORE TURNING EASTERLY.  GIVEN HIGH SNOW TO WATER<br />RATIOS...THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF 4 INCH AMOUNTS ACROSS<br />NORTHEASTERN MO IN A REGION OF MID LEVEL FRONTOGENESIS ALONG THE<br />TRACK OF THE LOW.  INCREASED PROBABILITIES OF 4 AND 8 INCH AMOUNTS<br />ARE INDICIATED ALONG THE OH RIVER GIVEN THE TENDANCY FOR HIGHER<br />PCPN IN AREAS WHERE THE LOW PIVOTS AND MAKES ITS TUIRN. THE 13/18Z<br />AND 14/00Z RUNS WERE CONSISTENT IN SENDING THE MESSAGE OF A<br />NORTHWARD SHIFT TO THE TRACK OF THE LOW...BUT THE 14/06Z NAM<br />BACKED AWAY FROM THAT IDEA ALONG AND SHIFTED THE PRECIP MAX BACK<br />SOUTH OF THE OH RIVER.  THE HPC MANUAL GRAPHICS WERE NOT ALTERED<br />SIGNIFICANTLY BY THE 06Z NAM STILL SHOWED SUFFICENT MESOSCALE<br />FORCING IN THE FORM OF FGEN IN AREAS COVERED BY THE PROBABILITY<br />MAPS...PLUS THE FACT THAT THE 00Z NAM HAD A LOT OF SUPPORT FROM<br />THE OPERATIONAL SUITE AND ENSEMBLES.  <br /><br />AS A SURFACE COLD FRONT ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM<br />SWEEPS TO THE SOUTH AND EAST...COLD ADVECTION LOWERED LOW LEVEL<br />TEMPS/THICKNESSES SHOULD ALLOW FOR PCPN TO FALL IN THE FORM OF<br />SNOW AND PERHAPS SOME SLEET ACROSS THE TN VALLEY AND INTO PARTS OF<br />AL/GA FROM SUNDAY NIGHT INTO EARLY MONDAY MORNING.  THERE SOULD BE<br />ENOUGH PCPN TO WARRANT A LOW END MDT RISK EXTENDING INTO NORTHERN<br />GA/AL WITH A SLGT RISK EXTNENDING SOUTHWARD BEHIND THE FRONT.<br />THE PROBABILITY OF SIGNIFICANT ICING IS LESS THAN 10 PERCENT.<br /><br /></pre><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">The system we are watching is a
strong upper level system which drops down from Canada and spread a
swath of precipitation into the Deep South and Tennessee valley before
turning east and likely bringing more precipitation to the upper
southeast and eventually turning into a good snowstorm for the
northeast. This storm has been intriguing to follow on the models,
because if you just look at the 850mb T charts, it looks like the whole
southeast is in for another round of snow tonight and Monday.
However, you have to dig deeper than that. While this may be mostly
snow and accumulating snows for parts of Tennessee and the mountains,
most areas I think are going to struggle with a lack of boundary layer
cool air and warm nose aloft plus a possible lack of moisture in the seeder-feeder zone for dendrite growth. Most areas will see southwesterly winds at the surface and
through the lowest few thousand feet of the atmosphere which will melt
the snow as it falls into it.&nbsp;Thus as of now, outside of the mountains,
I am not expecting this to be a big deal. Areas in Tennessee, northern Alabama and
Georgia, and western NC and NW SC, could see the precip change to snow
and perhaps pickup a quick dusting or an inch, but I just don't see
more than that from this, despite the cold temperatures at 850mb. As always the weather is constantly changing so logically forecast must constantly change, they are never written in stone. I see big BUST/FAIL written over this as there are things (warm nose aloft) that could keep it more rain than anything else with little moisture left by the time it gets cold enough so there is little or no snow accumulation OR CONVERSELY due to the steep lapse rates aloft and strong omega (vertical motions) the strong lift could create scattered elevated convection (thundersnow) which would dump VERY heavy amounts in a short time over a small and unpredictable area.<br /></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</div>The
pattern will remain cold and active the next 2-3 of weeks. The
models are showing the potential for a threat next weekend sometime in
the Friday-Monday time frame, and then perhaps the threat for a big
storm around 2/26 give or take 4 days. I cannot nail down a specific storm or storms or their nature this far out, &nbsp;but the amplifying ridge out west will send down
more northern stream s/w and it looks like the southern stream will
stay active as well, so we should not lack for threats. All part and parcel of what I've been talking about for weeks and months now. This late winter is closely paralleling 1958, 1964 and 1978 so check you history books for what might happen into April.<pre><br /></pre><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/not-a-puppy-love-not-a-boring.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2010/02/not-a-puppy-love-not-a-boring.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Snow Atlanta Georgia sleet rain thundersnow extreme weather</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:28:29 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
