<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Kirk Mellish&apos;s Weather Commentary</title>
        <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:22:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>El Nino and the coming winter</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Not all El Nino winters are the same because not all El Ninos are created equal and it's not the only thing that affects winter weather patterns. See this link for details. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner~y2009m11d17-El-Nino-and-the-coming-winter">El Nino winters usually but not always</a>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/el-nino-and-the-coming-winter.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/el-nino-and-the-coming-winter.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">El Nino</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">extreme weather</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kirk Mellish</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Winter forecast</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:22:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Looking back and forward</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div id="hidefrompromo" style="FONT-SIZE: 11px; FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0pt 10pt 10px 0px; WIDTH: 310px; COLOR: rgb(51,51,51)"><img style="PADDING-BOTTOM: 5px" height="240" alt="ECMWF mean 500mb jet stream flow 168-240hr mean ending 11/23 Left panel.&#13;Right panel: GFS" src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID4648/images/resized_test8.gif" width="300" /><br />ECMWF mean 500mb jet stream flow 168-240hr mean ending 11/23 Left panel. Right panel: GFS <br /><span class="new_timestamp" style="FONT-SIZE: 10px"><font color="#999999">Penn State University Dept. of Meteorology</font></span></div>
<p>Not the most typical weather on a nationwide basis since September. The long-range models have on several occasions over the past two weeks suggested a re-alignment of the hemispheric flow that would bring more typical November conditions. However, they have repeatedly had to back off those projections.</p>
<p>The latest operational variants of the the American GFS and the European ECMWF do show some changes but also have familiar hints of the split flow, a strong and active Pacific Jet and a preference for a Mid-continent favored storm track with a distinct lack of strong signals for any widespread or lasting cold. The Rockies, Great Basin of the Southwest and the Western and Northern Plains still seem favored for snow.&nbsp; Bouts of warmth and rainy spells with some risk of strong thunderstorms favors the East and Dixie with some back and forth on temperatures. The model suggestions for a more wintry turn for the end of November are present true enough, but are suspect by me for now due to previous "false starts or false alarms".</p>
<p>In general a fairly progressive type pattern looks to continue and I have to look with eyebrows raised at model hints of a pattern change until AT LEAST after the 24th of this month. I say at least because I will suspect no major pattern shift until sometime in December unless I see changes in teleconnection points or strong model convergence to a new pattern in the consensus of equations. The long-range outlook in general for Georgia the next 30-Days is for temps to average below-normal with rainfall above-normal. The 90-Day outlook temps to average below-normal with precipitation near-normal.</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/looking-back-and-forward.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/looking-back-and-forward.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Autumn</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long-range weather outlook</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">November</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">October</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:10:16 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Snow</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I wonder why so many snow lovers live in the South where it rarely happens? It's not like we don't know where we should move if we love it so. Personally I enjoy it enough that I would move if I could, and might be that rare American who retires someplace snowier instead of sunnier. But then I've always been weird about weather LOL.<br /><br />So how long has it been since Atlanta last had a "big snow"? Of course it depends on your definition of big snow, mine or Atlanta's. Most people would say its been years, many years, a decade or more. But it was just last year!&nbsp; And before that there were good snows earlier in this decade and in the 1990s. But one of those big snows was on a weekend and quickly turned to rain and melted away. We only get 2 inches of snow on average, that is the "climate norm" which is a set 30-year mean (presently 1971-2001)<br /><br />Of course, if it snows on the weekend and school and work are not canceled, in Atlanta that equals it never happened LOL.&nbsp; Last year our significant snow occurred on a Sunday, March 1st.&nbsp; 4.2 inches officially at the airport, yet many areas got little or nothing so we were accused by some of forecasting too much. Then again, a very narrow band from Columbus/La Grange NE to Athens got thundersnow and 5-7 inches and Athens 9 so we were accused by some of not forecasting enough!&nbsp; :D so you can see how perspective (my backyard is the universe and all of Metro Atlanta LOL) and memory and IMPACT can affect perceptions of reality. <br /><br />My preliminary winter forecast was issued way back in September. The final version will be issued NO LATER than the first week of December. Sorry about all the LOLs, I know that can get get annoying. LOL Oops.<br /><br />As I look at some of the research analogues for the winter outlook it dawned on me that the climate normals alone make it harder to zero in on snow or ice where many years see none.<br />Probably impossible to correctly estimate for places say along or South of I-10 for example but much easier to pick up on tendencies in the atmospheric signals in the Rockies and upper Midwest or New England states where snow is common yet follows some patterns.<br /><br />When your locations average mean normal seasonal snowfall is zero OR very small the standard deviation can be quite high. In other words, since you usually get little or no snow...NOT getting any snow is NOT news. Yet just a little WILL make news and "a lot" will be headline news. Also it only takes ONE "half-way" decent storm (non major by meteorological standards) to dump the historic average or more.<br /><br />Whereas if you live in a place where snow is commonplace and not news, it will take one HUGE storm to make headlines or more often, MANY storms to get you above the normal seasonal snowfall average. And it will take either many routine storms OR a couple biggies to be significantly above a "typical" winter.&nbsp; But in places like Atlanta you can have a snow total well above "typical" much easier-- a single decent storm (even if meteorologically unremarkable) or a handful of puny ones.&nbsp; This makes predicting what a future winter will bring much harder where snow is rare. We've seen this in the past where the temp forecast was great and the total precipitation forecast was right, but the snowfall forecast way off. And of course the data available is at Hartsfield, and as we saw last year a single point will not always be representative of a sprawling metro area like Atlanta. But I'll give it the old college try anyway. The strength of the El Nino, and the sign of the NAO and PDO are making this a difficult call to make.<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/snow.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/snow.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">snow Atlanta Georgia snowsnow ice climate normal winter snowfall Average</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:06:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Ida when the winds of November come late</title>
            <description>Since 1980 there have been only 6 hurricanes of 100 mph or more (Ida was at one point) in the Gulf or Atlantic basin in the month of November, Ida being number 6th. The last November storm to strike the U.S. was Kate in 1985 it hit the Florida Pan Handle. The latest U.S. landfall was November 30th 1925 in the Tampa Bay area.</description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/ida-when-the-winds-of-november.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/ida-when-the-winds-of-november.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">hurricane Ida tropical storm Ida flooding Atlanta Georgia hurricane season November storms</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:49:49 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>How wet was it?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<pre>PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT<br />NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA<br />200 PM EDT WED NOV 4 2009<br /><br />...HISTORICAL RAINFALL FREQUENCY AMOUNTS OCCUR OVER PORTIONS OF<br />   NORTH GEORGIA IN SEPTEMBER 2009...<br /><br />THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HAS BEEN REVIEWING THE EXTREME HEAVY<br />RAINFALL THAT OCCURRED IN SEPTEMBER 2009 WHICH CAUSED EPIC FLOODING<br />IN PORTIONS OF NORTH GEORGIA. NUMEROUS LOCATIONS IN DOUGLAS...EAST<br />PAULDING...WEST COBB...EAST CARROLL...CENTRAL GWINNETT AND SOUTHWEST<br />WALKER COUNTIES EXCEEDED 10 INCHES OF RAIN DURING A 24 HOUR PERIOD.<br />THE GREATEST AMOUNT WAS 16.7 INCHES JUST WEST OF DOUGLASVILLE.<br /><br />THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE FOR 24 HOUR RAINFALL FREQUENCY PERIODS IN<br />NORTH GEORGIA AND THE CHANCES OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...<br /><br />7.2 INCHES IS 1.0 PERCENT...100 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />7.7 INCHES IS 0.5 PERCENT...200 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />8.2 INCHES IS 0.2 PERCENT...500 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />8.7 INCHES IS 0.1 PERCENT...1000 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />9.7 INCHES IS 0.05 PERCENT...5000 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br /><br />USING RAINFALL FREQUENCY CALCULATIONS...IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THE<br />CHANCES OF 10 INCHES OR MORE OCCURRING AT ANY GIVEN POINT ARE LESS<br />THAN ONE HUNDRETH OF ONE PERCENT. THIS MEANS THE ODDS ARE 1 IN 10000<br />OR MORE OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...OR A 10000 YEAR RAIN EVENT.<br /><br />WEATHER RADAR ESTIMATES COMBINED WITH AUTOMATED HOURLY RAINGAGE<br />REPORTS INDICATED THE 24 HOUR PERIOD WITH THE MOST INTENSE RAINFALL<br />FOR THE WHOLE STORM EVENT WAS FROM 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 20<br />THROUGH 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 21.<br /><br /></pre><div align="center">
<font class="title1" style="font-size: 16pt;" face="ARIAL,HELVETICA,FUTURA" size="4"><b>How Wet was this October?</b></font><br />
</div>

<div style="margin-left: 20px;">

<p>
<font class="bas1" face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
After being in a drought much of the last three years, several sites
across north and central Georgia has received some of the highest
rainfall in the past month or so. For instance, October 2009 is the
second wettest October ever at both Atlanta and Athens. The only
October that had more rainfall in Atlanta was 1995 when the remnants of
Hurricane Opal moved across the area early in the month bringing more
than 8 inches to Atlanta over a three day period. The 2009 year in
Athens will be second only to October of 1937 when Athens received
11.23 inches of rain. The following table shows the top ten wettest
Octobers at Atlanta, Athens, Columbus and Macon:<br />
</font></p>

<!--- Atlanta -->
<div class="base" style="margin-left: 35px;">

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Atlanta</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">11.04</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>8.71</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">7.53</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">7.14</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1932</td>
<td align="center">6.90</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">6.30</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">6.29</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">6.15</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1990</td>
<td align="center">6.12</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1914</td>
<td align="center">6.04</td> </tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Athens -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Athens</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td>

</tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">11.23</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>9.14</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1918</td>
<td align="center">8.21</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1914</td>
<td align="center">7.95</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1997</td>
<td align="center">7.75</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">7.73</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1986</td>
<td align="center">7.65</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1977</td>
<td align="center">7.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">7.40</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">7.29</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Macon -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Macon</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">9.39</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">8.46</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">7.49</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">7.36</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">7.16</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">6.61</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>6.37</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1993</td>
<td align="center">6.37</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1990</td>
<td align="center">6.31</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1911</td>
<td align="center">5.96</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Columbus -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">

<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Columbus</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">8.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">8.09</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">6.59</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>6.39</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2008</td>
<td align="center">5.48</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1975</td>
<td align="center">5.42</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">5.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">5.06</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">4.70</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">4.47</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br clear="all" />
<p>


</p>

<p>
<font class="bas1" face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
Looking at rainfall amounts since September 1, Athens and Macon was the
wettest 61 day period for September and October on record, while
Atlanta was number 2 and Columbus was number 3. It is interesting to
note that the rainfall experienced this year is in no way attributable
to a landfalling Tropical Storm or Hurricane. A look back through the <a href="http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastall.shtml">National Hurricane Center's Archives</a>
shows that the remnants of Tropical Storm Irene impacted Columbus
October 6-10th, 1959; Hurricane Dora affected Columbus September 9-12,
1964; and the remnants of Hurricane Opal impacted both Columbus and
Atlanta October 3-6th, 1995. Unfortunately data on tropical storms in
1888 and 1937 was unavailable. <br />
<br />
<br /></font></p>

<!--- Atlanta -->


<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Atlanta</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1888</td>
<td align="center">18.25</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>17.65</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">15.84</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">13.56</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1989</td>
<td align="center">13.35</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">13.23</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2002</td>
<td align="center">12.33</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">11.39</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1992</td>
<td align="center">11.39</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1988</td>
<td align="center">11.35</td> </tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Athens -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Athens</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td>

</tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>19.00</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1989</td>
<td align="center">16.15</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">15.56</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1997</td>
<td align="center">14.54</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">13.76</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">12.82</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1957</td>
<td align="center">12.66</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">12.63</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">11.98</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1918</td>
<td align="center">11.61</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Macon -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Macon</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>17.05</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">14.32</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">13.44</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1924</td>
<td align="center">13.05</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">12.77</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2000</td>
<td align="center">11.59</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">10.62</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1956</td>
<td align="center">9.96</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">9.81</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1988</td>
<td align="center">9.79</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Columbus -->



<table align="left" border="1" width="20%"><tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Columbus</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">12.89</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">12.11</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>11.69</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">10.83</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">10.03</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">9.90</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">8.87</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1965</td>
<td align="center">8.80</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1975</td>
<td align="center">8.27</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1951</td>
<td align="center">8.18</td></tr></tbody></table><pre><br /></pre><br /><br /><br />How do they make flood calculations and what do they mean?<br /><br />This can actually be quite complicated because it has its roots in
hydrology, engineering, statistical analysis and probability theory. So
I am going to over simplify. A common problem in many fields such as
geophysics, economics, meteorology and many other fields is a
determination of periodicity. That is to decide if certain data taken
over time provides evidence of periodic behavior which can then be used
to improve prediction of future behavior for planning purposes.
Examples would be how often might we expect a crop failure, an
earthquake of a given magnitude, a hurricane direct hit, or a flood of
X level.<br /><br />So in the case of flooding, the total record of known
rainfall occurrences in the past and data from past floods are combined
with knowledge of the flood plain in question, the topography,
land-use, vegetation, soil types, elevation and land slope of the river
basin etc. and put into mathematical formulas to determine what amount
of rain, over what area, over what period of time, will lead to what
level of flooding in various locations. For example, when determining
whether to issue a flood watch. The forecaster first determines the
amount of rain expected, then consults charts of current soil moisture
and river levels. Thus a 6 hour rainfall rate, 12 hour 24 hour etc.
rain flood criteria is found and if it will be met or exceeded a watch
is issued.<br /><br />This also allows for the development of a so-called
100 year flood plain map or base flood and a 500 year or extreme flood
plain map used for urban planning. A 100-year flood is major flooding.
A 500 year flood is extreme and historic. Lesser flood levels can also
be calculated.<br /><br />Mother nature of course does not follow
statistics because it is a non-linear or chaotic system. Nature can
give us three 100 year floods in one year or two 500 year floods in a
single decade, or a 500 year drought followed by a 500 year flood
within a 3 year period or anything she wants, as the extreme climate
variation Georgia has seen over the last 5-15 years testifies.<br /><br />Specifically the term a 100 year flood does <b>NOT</b>
mean such a flood should be expected only once in a lifetime or once
every 100 years. It means such a level of flooding from the
aforementioned formulas has a 1% chance of occurring in ANY given year
and therefore is a 1/100 year event, <u>statistically speaking </u> it should occur once in every 100 years. The 500-year flood has a 00.2% chance of occurring in any <i>given</i> year and therefore statistically would be expected to occur once every 500 years.<br /><br /><p>FEMA
publishes flood insurance rate maps (F.I.R.M.) that show various
categories of flood hazard zones. However, the calculations,
engineering, and surveying needed to determine those zones are done by
engineers working in the private sector. This work might be done under
these circumstances:</p><ol><li>An area-wide study (maybe an entire
county) to update a set of F.I.R.M.s, such as for an urbanizing area.
This will normally be contracted by the local community, often with
Federal and State funding.</li><li>Study of a specific river or stream,
within a single community, to assist with planning and orderly
development. The community will normally contract with the engineer.</li><li>Study
of a short stretch of a waterway that is to be developed (or has been
developed) to determine the impact of the development on the
flood-carrying capacity. This is typically contracted and paid for
totally in the private sector.</li><li>Occasionally FEMA itself, or
another branch of the Federal or State government will contract with
private sector engineers for a major flood study. This is most
typically true for levee systems or flood control dams and reservoirs.</li></ol><h3 class="dynamic">Hydrology and Hydraulics</h3><p>For
this flood plain work, the engineer must complete certain calculations.
Hydrology calculations predict rainfall and compute the resulting
stream flow. This is determined by the physical characteristics of the
drainage basin--area, slope, shape, soil type, amount of
development--and the regional climate--probable rainfall pattern and
intensity based on years of historical records.</p><p>FEMA procedures
require that all flood mapping be based on what is called the 100-year
flood. This is the rainfall amount and associated stream flow that have
a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year (and thus
statistically should occur once every hundred years). FEMA calls this
the base flood. Calculations are also done for the 500 year flood,
although that is less important in flood insurance issues than is the
base flood.</p><p>Hydraulic calculations take the run-off determined
from hydrology and compute the depth and spread of flood waters. The
physical characteristics of the stream, such as slope, main channel
dimensions, overbank dimensions, roughness, obstructions, and
development on the overbank, are all factored into the calculations.</p><p>The
hydraulics of most interest are for the base flood. The calculations
determine the height of flood waters from the 100 year rainfall, which
is then called the base flood elevation (BFE). This is the elevation of
greatest regulatory significance within the flood plain.</p><p><font face="arial" size="2">Flooding
occurs when an existing stream (such as a river or creek) can't handle
the waterflow. The cause of the high waterflow varies, but generally
comes from high amounts of precipitation, or from snowmelt. The
existing channel is overwhelmed, and the water "comes out of bank" to
enter what is termed the <em>flood plain</em>. </font></p><p><font face="arial" size="2">The
floodplain is a part the terrain adjacent to the channel where water
doesn't normally flow; a floodplain is often not obvious to the
inexperienced observer. A floodplain is simply a natural storage
reservoir for flood waters, and has been created by nature, the master
engineer, through thousands of years of water flow and floods. </font></p><p><font face="arial" size="2">When
water leaves the normal flow channel, you have a flood event. The flood
level is defined by the amount of water present. There are two general
factors affecting the level of the flood: </font></p><ul><li> The amount of water in the channel. </li><li> The shape and characteristics of the channel at a given point. </li></ul><p><font face="arial" size="2">The amount of water is governed by local precipitation: snowpack, rainfall, and sometimes storage capacity in a reservoir. </font></p><p><font face="arial" size="2">The
channel and shape characteristics control how fast the water flows. A
narrow, steep channel tends to move water quickly, while a wide, flat
channel moves water slowly. When water moves slowly, it tends to rise,
or back up. This can cause over bank flooding. Other factors, such as
vegetation and soil, will also affect water flow. </font></p><p><font face="arial" size="2">Flood
events are defined by the probability that a certain amount of water is
possible any one year. For example, the infamous "100-year flood" is in
fact the level of water with a 1-percent chance (1 in 100) occurring
any one year. The amount of water actually varies from river to river.
In fact, that amount can vary along a river. The use of "n year flood"
is technical jargon that has caused endless problems with the public.
The term does <em><strong>not</strong></em> mean that a flood occurs
every n years, but that it has a chance of 1/n of occurring any one
year. Water volume increases as the probability decreases. The table
below shows how this might affect you: </font></p><table border="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><th colspan="4" bgcolor="#eae2d0">Flood Probabilities for any one year </th></tr><tr><th><font face="arial" size="2">"Year"</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Probability</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Percent</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Flows</font></th></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">500</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.002</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">00.2%</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Extreme</font></td></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">100</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.010</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">01.0%</font></td><td valign="TOP">Major<br /></td></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">50</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.020</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">02.0%</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Moderate</font></td></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">25</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.040</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">04.0%</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Light to moderate</font></td></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">10</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.100</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">10.0%</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Light</font></td></tr><tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">5</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.200</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">20.0%</font></td><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Mild</font></td></tr></tbody></table><p><font face="arial" size="2">In
short, the infrequent floods tend to high and violent water flows (and
a good thing, too!). The common floods are much smaller, although
damage is still possible. </font></p><p><font face="arial" size="2">"Great!"
you say, "But how high is a 5-year flood?" The answer, as noted
earlier, is not simple. That's because the climate varies, and
conditions affecting water flow along a channel change. Therefore, each
site must be examined to determine the potential water elevations! This
has been done extensively across the country by FEMA, for 100 and 500
year flood plains in selected communities. Such a study is rarely made
for lesser floods, although data from 100 flood plain studies can yield
estimates for lesser floods. </font></p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/how-wet-was-it.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/how-wet-was-it.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Atlanta Georgia flood record rainfall National Weather Service historic flooding 500 year flood calculations flood plain</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:12:26 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>How wet you say?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<pre>PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT<br />NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE PEACHTREE CITY GA<br />200 PM EDT WED NOV 4 2009<br /><br />...HISTORICAL RAINFALL FREQUENCY AMOUNTS OCCUR OVER PORTIONS OF<br />   NORTH GEORGIA IN SEPTEMBER 2009...<br /><br />THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HAS BEEN REVIEWING THE EXTREME HEAVY<br />RAINFALL THAT OCCURRED IN SEPTEMBER 2009 WHICH CAUSED EPIC FLOODING<br />IN PORTIONS OF NORTH GEORGIA. NUMEROUS LOCATIONS IN DOUGLAS...EAST<br />PAULDING...WEST COBB...EAST CARROLL...CENTRAL GWINNETT AND SOUTHWEST<br />WALKER COUNTIES EXCEEDED 10 INCHES OF RAIN DURING A 24 HOUR PERIOD.<br />THE GREATEST AMOUNT WAS 16.7 INCHES JUST WEST OF DOUGLASVILLE.<br /><br />THE FOLLOWING AMOUNTS ARE FOR 24 HOUR RAINFALL FREQUENCY PERIODS IN<br />NORTH GEORGIA AND THE CHANCES OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...<br /><br />7.2 INCHES IS 1.0 PERCENT...100 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />7.7 INCHES IS 0.5 PERCENT...200 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />8.2 INCHES IS 0.2 PERCENT...500 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />8.7 INCHES IS 0.1 PERCENT...1000 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br />9.7 INCHES IS 0.05 PERCENT...5000 YEAR RAIN EVENT<br /><br />USING RAINFALL FREQUENCY CALCULATIONS...IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THE<br />CHANCES OF 10 INCHES OR MORE OCCURRING AT ANY GIVEN POINT ARE LESS<br />THAN ONE HUNDRETH OF ONE PERCENT. THIS MEANS THE ODDS ARE 1 IN 10000<br />OR MORE OF RECURRENCE IN ANY GIVEN YEAR...OR A 10000 YEAR RAIN EVENT.<br /><br />WEATHER RADAR ESTIMATES COMBINED WITH AUTOMATED HOURLY RAINGAGE<br />REPORTS INDICATED THE 24 HOUR PERIOD WITH THE MOST INTENSE RAINFALL<br />FOR THE WHOLE STORM EVENT WAS FROM 800 PM EDT ON SEPTEMBER 20.<br /><br /></pre><div style="margin-left: 20px;">

<p>
<font class="bas1" face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
After being in a drought much of the last three years, several sites
across north and central Georgia has received some of the highest
rainfall in the past month or so. For instance, October 2009 is the
second wettest October ever at both Atlanta and Athens. The only
October that had more rainfall in Atlanta was 1995 when the remnants of
Hurricane Opal moved across the area early in the month bringing more
than 8 inches to Atlanta over a three day period. The 2009 year in
Athens will be second only to October of 1937 when Athens received
11.23 inches of rain. The following table shows the top ten wettest
Octobers at Atlanta, Athens, Columbus and Macon:<br />
</font></p>

<!--- Atlanta -->
<div class="base" style="margin-left: 35px;">

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Atlanta</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">11.04</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>8.71</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">7.53</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">7.14</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1932</td>
<td align="center">6.90</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">6.30</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">6.29</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">6.15</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1990</td>
<td align="center">6.12</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1914</td>
<td align="center">6.04</td> </tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Athens -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Athens</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td>

</tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">11.23</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>9.14</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1918</td>
<td align="center">8.21</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1914</td>
<td align="center">7.95</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1997</td>
<td align="center">7.75</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">7.73</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1986</td>
<td align="center">7.65</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1977</td>
<td align="center">7.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">7.40</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">7.29</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Macon -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Macon</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">9.39</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">8.46</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">7.49</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">7.36</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">7.16</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">6.61</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>6.37</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1993</td>
<td align="center">6.37</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1990</td>
<td align="center">6.31</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1911</td>
<td align="center">5.96</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Columbus -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">

<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Columbus</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">8.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">8.09</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">6.59</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>6.39</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2008</td>
<td align="center">5.48</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1975</td>
<td align="center">5.42</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">5.41</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">5.06</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1966</td>
<td align="center">4.70</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">4.47</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br clear="all" />
<p>


</p><div style="margin-left: 20px;">

<p>
<font class="bas1" face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
Looking at rainfall amounts since September 1, Athens and Macon was the
wettest 61 day period for September and October on record, while
Atlanta was number 2 and Columbus was number 3. It is interesting to
note that the rainfall experienced this year is in no way attributable
to a landfalling Tropical Storm or Hurricane. A look back through the <a href="http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pastall.shtml">National Hurricane Center's Archives</a>
shows that the remnants of Tropical Storm Irene impacted Columbus
October 6-10th, 1959; Hurricane Dora affected Columbus September 9-12,
1964; and the remnants of Hurricane Opal impacted both Columbus and
Atlanta October 3-6th, 1995. Unfortunately data on tropical storms in
1888 and 1937 was unavailable. <br />
<br />
<br /></font></p>

<!--- Atlanta -->
<div class="base" style="margin-left: 35px;">

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Atlanta</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1888</td>
<td align="center">18.25</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>17.65</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">15.84</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">13.56</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1989</td>
<td align="center">13.35</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">13.23</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2002</td>
<td align="center">12.33</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">11.39</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center">1992</td>
<td align="center">11.39</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1988</td>
<td align="center">11.35</td> </tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Athens -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Athens</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td>

</tr><tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td> </tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>19.00</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1989</td>
<td align="center">16.15</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">15.56</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1997</td>
<td align="center">14.54</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1898</td>
<td align="center">13.76</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">12.82</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1957</td>
<td align="center">12.66</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1970</td>
<td align="center">12.63</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1937</td>
<td align="center">11.98</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1918</td>
<td align="center">11.61</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Macon -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Macon</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>17.05</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">14.32</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1929</td>
<td align="center">13.44</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1924</td>
<td align="center">13.05</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">12.77</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2000</td>
<td align="center">11.59</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">10.62</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1956</td>
<td align="center">9.96</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1915</td>
<td align="center">9.81</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1988</td>
<td align="center">9.79</td></tr>

</tbody></table>

<!--- Columbus -->

<table align="left" border="1" width="20%">

<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>Columbus</b></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" align="center"><b>WETTEST</b></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">YEAR</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#b0ffb0">RAINFALL</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1964</td>
<td align="center">12.89</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1995</td>
<td align="center">12.11</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center"><font color="red"><b>2009</b></font></td>
<td align="center"><font color="red"><b>11.69</b></font></td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">2004</td>
<td align="center">10.83</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1976</td>
<td align="center">10.03</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1959</td>
<td align="center">9.90</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1994</td>
<td align="center">8.87</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1965</td>
<td align="center">8.80</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1975</td>
<td align="center">8.27</td></tr>

<tr><td align="center">1951</td>
<td align="center">8.18</td></tr>
</tbody></table>

</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br clear="all" />



<br clear="all" />

<a href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc/" class="bas1">For more on flood calculations scroll down my blog for the report on the "500 year flood"<br /></a> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/how-wet-you-say.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/how-wet-you-say.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Atlanta Georgia flood record rainfall National Weather Service</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">historic flooding</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:45:17 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Things that make up a long-range winter forecast</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>Pacific </strong></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>1) ENSO Cycle</strong> <strong>(+0.7 to +1.0 C as of 10/12/09):</strong> defined as current status of the <a href="http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/enso_cycle.shtml">El Nino Southern Oscillation Cycle</a> as reported by the US Climate Prediction Center in a <a href="http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso_advisory/ensodisc.html">brief diagnostic discussion</a> as well as the <a href="http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf">weekly ENSO update</a>.</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong></strong></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>2) PDO Index (positive phase as of 10/8/09): </strong>The <a href="http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/">Pacific Decadal Oscillation</a> is defined as monitoring the "<em>leading
principal component of North Pacific monthly sea surface temperature
variability (poleward of 20N for the 1900-93 period)." </em>Researchers at the University of Washington suggest that "<em>combining ENSO and PDO information may enhance the skill of empirical North American climate forecasts."</em> Sources: <a href="http://www.atmos.washington.edu/%7Emantua/REPORTS/PDO/PDO_egec.htm">UWA, Climate Impacts Group.</a> </span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>Atlantic</strong></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>1) SSTA (Data pending</strong>)<strong>: </strong>Defined
as sea surface temperature anomalies for the Gulf of Mexico and West
Atlantic. The American Meteorological Society states in a <a href="http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-abstract&amp;doi=10.1175%2F1525-7541%282003%29004%3C0856%3ACIOSST%3E2.0.CO%3B2&amp;ct=1">February 2003 journal article</a> that "<em>Using a combination of statistical methods and monthly SST anomalies (SSTAs) from one or two ocean regions</em>"
there are strong correlations between sea surface temperatures and
precipitation during much of the year in the United States."</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>2) 2009 Hurricane Season</strong> <strong>(Data pending):</strong> Defined as the frequency and track of tropical cyclones in the Atlantic basin. It is hypothesized for discussion that <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE59D2UK20091014">a less active hurricane season</a>
combined with a positive ENSO cycle may correlate to increased
probability of significant winter storms in the Eastern United States
in the following six month period from October to March. Historical
data supporting this hypothesis will be provided.</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong><u>B) <a href="http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/">Cryosphere</a></u></strong> (Monitoring specific data sets about the frozen part of the northern hemisphere's polar water system)</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>1. </strong><a href="http://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/ice_extent/cur/ice_extent_2009.png"><strong>Arctic sea ice</strong></a> <strong>(5.27 mil sq. km as of 9/28</strong>):
Defined as the total surface area in million square kilometers of sea
ice within the Arctic Circle as reported weekly by the National Ice
Center.</span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>2. </strong><a href="http://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/ims_gif/DATA/cursnow.gif"><strong>N. Hemispheric snow cover</strong></a>
(data pending): Defined as a visual interpretation and data on extent
of snow cover across the United States, Canada, Russia, Northern Asia
and Europe</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong></strong></span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong><u>C) Atmospheric Data</u> </strong>(Monitoring
quantitative indices which track variability in atmospheric
teleconnective patterns, such as how might air pressure changes over
Greenland affect the track of a US East coast storm). Note: Data and
info for this section posted later Sunday. </span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>NAO:</strong>
North Atlantic Oscillation Index (my preferred "local teleconnection"
that reveals much about current weather, upcoming pattern changes,
storm tracks and cold outbreaks)</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>PNA:</strong> Pacific-North American Index</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>MJO:</strong>
Madden-Julian Oscillation Index (wildly intriguing atmospheric hiccup
that has been suggested by some is a major factor in the ENSO cycle--
details later.)</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>QBO</strong>:
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation Index (interesting pattern relationships
between easterly or westerly phase of this index, current solar cycle
and latitude variation of North Atlantic winter storms.) Source: <a href="http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1988/GL015i005p00409.shtml">1988 article</a> in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.</span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><em>now this one's a toughie..</em></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong>AAM:</strong> <a href="http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-817925121.html">Axial Angular Momentun of the Atmosphere</a>. (you better take some Tylenol before we go over this.)</span></div><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><strong><u>D) <a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/index.html">Solar Cycle</a></u></strong><a href="http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/SolarCycle/index.html"> </a>(data pending): Defined as the monthly mean, frequency and duration of sun spots as an influential factor in Earth climate)</span><br /><br /><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><strong> BASIC PROJECTIONS: </strong>The
current "lakes cutter" pattern I believe will shift back to the East
Coast within two weeks. If this shift aligns with several climate
teleconnections that suggest a return to cold EVEN BEFORE 11/15, the
potential remains for a surprisingly early arrival of significant
winter weather into the Mid-Atlantic.</span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"></span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"><strong> GENERAL CLIMATE &amp; WEATHER TRENDS:</strong>
The fading and less-than-active hurricane season has permitted sea
surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico and western Atlantic to
remain at or above normal. This has enhanced warm moisture advection
into developing systems. The biggest Colorado snowstorm in 12 years is
continuing evidence of this trend, clearly demonstrating the influence
a strong subtropical jet can have in delivering moisture from the the
East Pacific. Other indicators:</span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">- </span><a href="http://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/ice_extent/cur/ice_extent_2009.png"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">Recovery of Arctic sea ice</span></a><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"> at faster rate than previous 3 years;</span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">- Recovery of </span><a href="http://www.natice.noaa.gov/pub/ims_gif/DATA/cursnow.gif"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">Northern Hemispheric snow cover</span></a><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">, notably in Eurasia;</span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">- Strengthening El Nino signature&nbsp;(</span><a href="http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">warming to 1.4 C in region 4</span></a><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">);</span><br />
</div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">- Favorable North Pacific ocean temp pattern (</span><a href="http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/PDO.latest"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">PDO:&nbsp; 0.09 in Aug / 0.54 in Sep</span></a><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">);</span><br />
</div><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;">- Solar cycle status similar to 1901-03, similar anomalous Autumn temps.</span><br /></div><div align="justify"><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"></span></div><div align="justify">This nice write up is provided by Science teacher Mr. Foot of Baltimore County Schools.<strong><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS;"><br /></span></strong></div> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/things-that-make-up-a-longrang.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/11/things-that-make-up-a-longrang.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate outlooks</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">El Nino</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long-range weather forecasting</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter forecast</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:17:24 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Will the tornado really be there at that time and place?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.spegweb.com/papers/radar/">Scientific reports say: No.</a><div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/will-the-tornado-really-be-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/will-the-tornado-really-be-the.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">doppler radar</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">hook echo</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">hyper-local weather</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">neighborhood weather</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">pathcast</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tornado forecasting</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:24:29 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>UGA Tornado Research</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Correlation does not always equal causation. It seems to me that a wet fall and or winter is a sign of an active jet stream across the Southern U.S. so it stands to reason that such a pattern will linger into the Spring before breaking down if it's going to do so. Thus more rain days equal more storm days and thus more "opportunities" for tornadoes. If you are in a high pressure ridge pattern over the South keeping the jet stream storm track further North and West, then logically this creates drought and if you are in a winter drought it too will likely linger into the Spring before the pattern breaks down if it is going to do so. Drought means less rain storms which means less severe storms thus logically fewer "opportunities" for tornadoes.&nbsp; Here is the abstract and the link to the full research online.<br /><br /><p>
<b class="h2">A seasonal-scale climatological analysis correlating spring tornadic activity with antecedent
fall-winter drought in the southeastern United States</b></p><p>
<font class="lrg" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Marshall&nbsp;Shepherd<sup>1</sup>, Dev&nbsp;Niyogi<sup>2</sup> and&nbsp;Thomas L&nbsp;Mote<sup>1</sup></font></p><p>
<sup>1</sup>&nbsp;Climate Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Georgia, Athens,
GA 30602,
USA<br /><sup>2</sup>&nbsp;Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
47907,
USA</p><p>
Received&nbsp;10 February 2009<br />Accepted&nbsp;16 June 2009<br />Published&nbsp;24 June 2009</p><p>
</p>
<span class="sanserif"><b>Abstract.&nbsp;</b></span>Using rain gauge and satellite-based rainfall climatologies and the NOAA Storm Prediction
Center tornado database (1952-2007), this study found a statistically significant <i>tendency
for fall-winter drought conditions to be correlated with below-normal tornado days the
following spring</i> in north Georgia (i.e.&nbsp;93% of the years) and other regions of the Southeast.
Non-drought years had nearly twice as many tornado days in the study area as
drought years and were also five to six times more likely to have multiple tornado
days. Individual tornadic events are largely a function of the convective-mesoscale
thermodynamic and dynamic environments, thus the study does not attempt to overstate
predictability. Yet, the results may provide seasonal guidance in an analogous
manner to the well known Sahelian rainfall and Cape Verde hurricane activity
relationships.&nbsp; <a href="http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/-search=66527503.1/1748-9326/4/2/024012/erl9_2_024012.html">UGA drought-tornado relationship research paper</a>
<p><b></b><br /></p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/uga-tornado-research.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/uga-tornado-research.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long-range weather forecasting</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tornado season</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tornadoes</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:18:32 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>NOAA/NWS Winter Forecast differs some from mine</title>
            <description><![CDATA[They only give probabilities and don't say anything about snow or ice for anyone. Here is their outlook:<br /><br /><h2>NOAA:  El Niño to Help Steer U.S.  Winter Weather</h2>
		<p id="releaseDate">October 15, 2009</p>
		<div class="rightAlignImage width300"> 
		<img src="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/images/winteroutlook_precip_300.jpg" alt="Winter Outlook - Precipitation" height="234" width="300" />  <p><a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/images/winteroutlook_precip.jpg">High Resolution</a> (Credit: NOAA)		</p>
		</div>
		<p>El
Niño in the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean is expected to
be a dominant climate factor that will influence the December through
February winter weather in the United States, according to the 2009
Winter Outlook released today by NOAA's Climate Prediction Center. Such
seasonal outlooks are part of NOAA's suite of climate services.</p>
        <p>"We
expect El Niño to strengthen and persist through the winter months,
providing clues as to what the weather will be like during the period,"
says Mike Halpert, deputy director of the Climate Prediction Center - a
division of the National Weather Service. "Warmer ocean water in the
equatorial Pacific shifts the patterns of tropical rainfall that in
turn change the strength and position of the jetstream and storms over
the Pacific Ocean and the U.S." </p>
        <p>"Other climate factors
are also likely to play a role in the winter weather at times across
the country," added Halpert. "Some of these factors, such as the North
Atlantic Oscillation are difficult to predict more than one to two
weeks in advance. The NAO adds uncertainty to the forecast in the
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic portions of the country."</p>
        <h3>Highlights of the U.S. Winter Outlook (December  through February) include:        </h3>
        <ul type="disc"><li>
            <div class="rightAlignImage width300">
              <img src="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/images/winteroutlook_temp_300.jpg" alt="Winter Outlook - Temperature" height="234" width="300" /><p><a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2009/images/winteroutlook_temp.jpg">High Resolution</a> (Credit: NOAA)</p>
            </div>
          <strong>Warmer-than-average temperatures</strong>
are favored across much of the western and central U.S., especially in
the north-central states from Montana to Wisconsin. Though temperatures
may average warmer than usual, periodic outbreaks of cold air are still
possible. </li><li><strong>Below-average temperatures</strong>
are expected across the Southeast and mid-Atlantic from southern and
eastern Texas to southern Pennsylvania and south through Florida.</li><li><strong>Above-average precipitation</strong>
is expected in the southern border states, especially Texas and
Florida. Recent rainfall and the prospects of more should improve
current drought conditions in central and southern Texas. However,
tornado records suggest that there will also be an increased chance of
organized tornado activity for the Gulf Coast region this winter.</li><li><strong>Drier-than-average</strong> conditions are       expected in the Pacific Northwest and the Ohio       and Tennessee River        Valleys.</li><li><strong>Northeast</strong>:
Equal chances for above-, near-, or below-normal temperatures and
precipitation. Winter weather in this region is often driven not by El
Niño but by weather patterns over the northern Atlantic Ocean and
Arctic, such as the North Atlantic Oscillation. These patterns are
often more short-term, and are generally predictable only a week or so
in advance.</li><li><strong>California</strong><strong>:</strong> A slight tilt in the odds toward       wetter-than-average conditions over the entire state.</li><li><strong>Alaska</strong><strong>:</strong>
Milder-than-average temperatures except along the western coast. Equal
chances for above-, near-, or below-median precipitation for most areas
except above median for the northwest.</li><li><strong>Hawaii</strong><strong>:</strong> Below-average temperatures and precipitation are favored for the entire state..</li></ul>
        <p>This
seasonal outlook does not predict where and when snowstorms may hit or
total seasonal snowfall accumulations. Snow forecasts are dependent
upon winter storms, which are generally not predictable more than
several days in advance.</p><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/noaanws-winter-forecast-differ.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/noaanws-winter-forecast-differ.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NOAA National Weather Service Winter Forecast</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:05:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>What does that mean, a &quot;100-year flood&quot;?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[This can actually be quite complicated because it has its roots in hydrology, engineering, statistical analysis and probability theory. So I am going to over simplify. A common problem in many fields such as geophysics, economics, meteorology and many other fields is a determination of periodicity. That is to decide if certain data taken over time provides evidence of periodic behavior which can then be used to improve prediction of future behavior for planning purposes. Examples would be  how often might we expect a crop failure, an earthquake of a given magnitude, a hurricane direct hit, or a flood of X level.<br /><br />So in the case of flooding, the total record of known rainfall occurrences in the past and data from past floods are combined with knowledge of the flood plain in question, the topography, land-use, vegetation, soil types, elevation and land slope of the river basin etc. and put into mathematical formulas to determine what amount of rain, over what area, over what period of time, will lead to what level of flooding in various locations. For example, when determining whether to issue a flood watch. The forecaster first determines the amount of rain expected, then consults charts of current soil moisture and river levels. Thus a 6 hour rainfall rate, 12 hour 24 hour etc. rain flood criteria is found and if it will be met or exceeded a watch is issued.<br /><br />This also allows for the development of a so-called 100 year flood plain map or base flood and a 500 year or extreme flood plain map used for urban planning. A 100-year flood is major flooding. A 500 year flood is extreme and historic. Lesser flood levels can also be calculated.<br /><br />Mother nature of course does not follow statistics because it is a non-linear or chaotic system.&nbsp; Nature can give us three 100 year floods in one year or two 500 year floods in a single decade, or a 500 year drought followed by a 500 year flood within a 3 year period or anything she wants, as the extreme climate variation Georgia has seen over the last 5-15 years testifies.<br /><br />Specifically the term a 100 year flood does <b>NOT</b> mean such a flood should be expected only once in a lifetime or once every 100&nbsp; years. It means such a level of flooding from the aforementioned formulas has a 1% chance of occurring in ANY given year and therefore is a 1/100 year event, <u>statistically speaking </u> it should occur once in every 100 years. The 500-year flood has a 00.2% chance of occurring in any <i>given</i> year and therefore statistically would be expected to occur once every 500 years.<br /><br /><p>FEMA publishes flood insurance rate maps (F.I.R.M.) that show
various categories of flood hazard zones. However, the calculations,
engineering, and surveying needed to determine those zones are done by
engineers working in the private sector. This work might be done under
these circumstances:</p>
<ol><li>An area-wide study (maybe an entire county) to update a set of
F.I.R.M.s, such as for an urbanizing area. This will normally be
contracted by the local community, often with Federal and State funding.</li><li>Study
of a specific river or stream, within a single community, to assist
with planning and orderly development. The community will normally
contract with the engineer.</li><li>Study of a short stretch of a
waterway that is to be developed (or has been developed) to determine
the impact of the development on the flood-carrying capacity. This is
typically contracted and paid for totally in the private sector.</li><li>Occasionally
FEMA itself, or another branch of the Federal or State government will
contract with private sector engineers for a major flood study. This is
most typically true for levee systems or flood control dams and
reservoirs.</li></ol><h3 class="dynamic">Hydrology and Hydraulics</h3>
<p>For this flood plain work, the engineer must complete certain
calculations. Hydrology calculations predict rainfall and compute the
resulting stream flow. This is determined by the physical
characteristics of the drainage basin--area, slope, shape, soil type,
amount of development--and the regional climate--probable rainfall
pattern and intensity based on years of historical records.</p>
<p>FEMA procedures require that all flood mapping be based on what is
called the 100-year flood. This is the rainfall amount and associated
stream flow that have a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year
(and thus statistically should occur once every hundred years). FEMA
calls this the base flood. Calculations are also done for the 500 year
flood, although that is less important in flood insurance issues than
is the base flood.</p>
<p>Hydraulic calculations take the run-off determined from hydrology
and compute the depth and spread of flood waters. The physical
characteristics of the stream, such as slope, main channel dimensions,
overbank dimensions, roughness, obstructions, and development on the
overbank, are all factored into the calculations.</p>
<p>The hydraulics of most interest are for the base flood. The
calculations determine the height of flood waters from the 100 year
rainfall, which is then called the base flood elevation (BFE). This is
the elevation of greatest regulatory significance within the flood
plain.</p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">Flooding occurs when an existing stream
(such as a river or creek) can't handle the waterflow. The cause of the
high waterflow varies,
but generally comes from high amounts of precipitation, or from
snowmelt. The existing channel is overwhelmed, and the water "comes
out of bank" to enter what is termed the <em>flood plain</em>.
</font></p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">The floodplain is a part the terrain
adjacent to the channel where water doesn't normally flow; a floodplain
is often not obvious to the
inexperienced observer. A floodplain is simply a natural storage
reservoir for flood waters, and has been created by nature, the master
engineer, through thousands of years of water flow and floods.
</font></p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">When water leaves the normal flow channel,
you have a flood event. The flood level is defined by the amount of
water present. There are
two general factors affecting the level of the flood:
</font></p><p>
</p><ul><font face="arial" size="2"><li> The amount of water in the channel.
</li><li> The shape and characteristics of the channel at a given point.
</li></font></ul>
<p>
<font face="arial" size="2">The amount of water is governed by local precipitation: snowpack, rainfall, and sometimes storage capacity in a reservoir.
</font></p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">The channel and shape characteristics
control how fast the water flows. A narrow, steep channel tends to move
water quickly, while a
wide, flat channel moves water slowly. When water moves slowly, it
tends to rise, or back up. This can cause over bank flooding. Other
factors, such as vegetation and soil, will also affect water flow.
</font></p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">Flood events are defined by the probability
that a certain amount of water is possible any one year. For example,
the infamous
"100-year flood" is in fact the level of water with a 1-percent chance
(1 in 100) occurring any one year. The amount of water
actually varies from river to river. In fact, that amount can vary
along a river. The use of "n year flood" is technical jargon
that has caused endless problems with the public. The term does <em><strong>not</strong></em>
mean that a flood occurs every n years, but
that it has a chance of 1/n of occurring any one year. Water volume
increases as the probability decreases. The table below shows how
this might affect you:
</font></p><p>
<table border="2" bordercolor="#000000" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr><th colspan="4" bgcolor="#eae2d0">Flood Probabilities for any one year </th></tr>
<tr><th><font face="arial" size="2">"Year"</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Probability</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Percent</font></th><th><font face="arial" size="2">Flows</font></th></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">500</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.002</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">00.2%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Extreme</font></td></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">100</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.010</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">01.0%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP">Major<font face="arial" size="2"></font><br /></td></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">50</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.020</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">02.0%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Moderate</font></td></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">25</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.040</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">04.0%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Light to moderate</font></td></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">10</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.100</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">10.0%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Light</font></td></tr>
<tr align="CENTER"><td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">5</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">0.200</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">20.0%</font></td>
<td valign="TOP"><font face="arial" size="2">Mild</font></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">In short, the infrequent floods tend to
high and violent water flows (and a good thing, too!). The common
floods are much smaller,
although damage is still possible.
</font></p><p>
<font face="arial" size="2">"Great!" you say, "But how high is a 5-year
flood?" The answer, as noted earlier, is not simple. That's because the
climate varies, and conditions affecting water flow along a channel
change. Therefore, each site must be examined to determine the
potential water elevations! This has been done extensively across the
country by FEMA, for 100 and 500 year flood plains in selected
communities. Such a study is rarely made for lesser floods, although
data from 100 flood plain studies can yield estimates for lesser
floods.
</font></p>&nbsp; <br /><br />&nbsp; <br /><br /><br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/what-does-that-mean-a-100year.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/what-does-that-mean-a-100year.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">100 year flood</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">500-year flood</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flooding</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">heavy rainfall</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">statistics and probabilities in meteorology and engineering</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:07:31 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Eyes on the creeks ears on the radio</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Most new info will be shared on the radio this afternoon and tomorrow. But before I go to lunch thought I would add this quick info RE: flood risk tomorrow from NWS...<br /><br /><pre class="glossaryProduct">MODELS INDICATE<br />WIDESPREAD 2-4 INCHES...AND 12Z MODELS COMING IN THIS MORNING HAVE<br />HIGHER QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS<a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=QPFS" onclick="return popup(this, 'notes')"></a> (QPF)THAN LAST NIGHT`S RUNS. <br />WILL HAVE TO KEEP AN EYE ON<br />THINGS BUT MODELS TYPICALLY ARE UNDERDONE ON LARGE <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=QPF" onclick="return popup(this, 'notes')">QPF</a> EVENTS.<br />EXPECT WIDESPREAD <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=MINOR%20FLOODING" onclick="return popup(this, 'notes')">MINOR FLOODING</a> AT LEAST...WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED<br />TO SEE SEVERAL GAUGES RISE TO MODERATE <a href="http://forecast.weather.gov/glossary.php?word=FLOOD" onclick="return popup(this, 'notes')">FLOOD</a> STAGE WITH PERHAPS A<br />FEW MAJORS. STAY TUNED FOR FURTHER UPDATES ON THIS SITUATION.</pre> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/eyes-on-the-creeks-ears-on-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/eyes-on-the-creeks-ears-on-the.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Atlanta rain</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Flash Flood Watch</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flood statement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Georgia flooding</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">news</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">river flood warnings</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:57:56 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Weather headlines in the news</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<img src="file:///Users/kirkmelhuish/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot.png" alt="" />A cold outbreak befitting November much more than October has already left a
trail of broken temperature records in its wake, there will be many new record lows over an area from
northern Wyoming and the western Dakotas to Washington, northern Oregon and
southern British Columbia.  These readings, sometimes 25 degrees below normal, will shatter old records by 10 degrees or more in some
instances. <span name="mainstorydesc">In the wake of the record-breaking cold air
and snow that plunged through the Rockies and Plains early in the
weekend, a new disturbance is spreading accumulating
snow from Wyoming into the northern Plains. Up to half of a foot of
snow could fall. </span>Meanwhile Florida is having record warm temperatures. Floridians who have been enduring record heat since early last week
will have to wait until the end of this week before any of these fronts
bring in
cooler air.Such a combination usually leads to an active storm zone in-between and that will be the case the next week or two.&nbsp; Sunday night through Monday areas from the western Gulf Coast to the
southernmost Appalachians and Carolina Outer Banks will be wet rainfall along this
corridor also stretching the much of Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia will
often exceed 1 inch. Highest amounts will reach at least 3 inches.&nbsp; Another round of showers and thunderstorms will surge northward and
eastward through the South Tuesday into Wednesday. Toward the end of
the week, a
powerful storm system moving across the Midwest will drag a cold front
through the region, sparking more showers and thunderstorms.
<br />
<br />The storms that develop ahead of this cold front will have a better
shot
at becoming severe Thursday into Friday. This front is expected to push
southward into Florida by next weekend, bringing an end to the heat
wave that has been gripping the state.   <p><br />
Minor, local flooding may stem from this latest rash of southern downpours.
Wider impact will be that of rain-slicked roadways and the slowing of highway
traffic. And travelers through the airport may find delayed flights.</p><br />
Further heavy rains will hit areas of the South later in the week. On Monday, an area of snow will reach into northern
Wisconsin and northern Michigan along with parts of northern Ontario, Canada. Snow will reach east out of Wyoming and over South
Dakota and northern Nebraska into central and southern Minnesota and even
northwest Iowa. On Monday, the corridor of snowfall will reach into northern
Wisconsin and northern Michigan along with parts of northern Ontario, Canada.
&nbsp; 



<p>
</p><p><br />
The highest snowfall of 3 to locally 6 inches will stretch eastward from
Wyoming near the South Dakota-Nebraska line. However, most amounts along this
snow band will range from 1 to 3 inches. </p>


<p>
</p><p><br />
The snow and unusual cold will make for conditions of wintry driving with road
surfaces varying from slush and wet to slick, icy and hazardous. Interstate
highways I-25, I-29, I-35, I-80, I-90 and I-94 will be among the key roadways
subject to wintry driving conditions. Minneapolis-Saint Paul will get its first
significant snowfall of the season from this storm.The first big Pacific storm is set to strike California and the rest of the
West Coast as early as late Monday night. The monster storm will bring with it
plenty of rain, some very heavy, along with strong gusty winds. Rain amount by Wednesday morning will top 6 inches in a few
instance, amounts of 2-4 inches being widespread over the northern two-thirds
of the state. These are connected to  last week's powerful
western Pacific Typhoon. Melor dissipated after a pounding of Japan, but its
heavy load of tropical warmth and moisture has since been handed off down
stream to a storm slated to reach the California coast on Tuesday. Southern California
north and west of Los Angles is much more likely to get a soaking than areas
from the city on south and east. <br /></p><p>Weather buzz in the East is likely to include talk of early snow
late in the week. The storm will have tropical
warmth and moisture to one side and some unusually early cold to the other.
</p>

<p>
</p><p><br />
The storm center will track across the mid-Mississippi Valley by early Thursday
on to the Atlantic Seaboard on Friday. Cold soaking rain will fall north
of the immediate storm track over the Ohio Valley to the mid-Atlantic. </p>


<p>
</p><p><br />
Enough cold air will settle in place over the north-central Appalachian region
to trigger a little wet snow. Should all the essential factors fall into place,
a heavy wet snowfall would be the result in the higher elevations of Pennsylvania and New
York.&nbsp; High
temperatures Wednesday through Friday will be held in the 40s for the
first time this season across the interior Northeast, including
Buffalo, N.Y., Boston, Mass., and State College, Pa.<br />
<br />
Temperatures at night will drop into the 20s across the higher
elevations and 30s in most other areas to the north of the Mason-Dixon
Line. If you
haven't done so already, you may want to pull out your heavier coats
for the cold mornings that lie ahead later this week. Monday night into Tuesday will bring
some snow to the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the mountains of 
northern Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. Accumulations between 1 and 3
inches are possible.   <br />
<br />
</p>
The arctic high will keep the region mostly dry Wednesday before a powerful
storm system moves through Thursday into Friday. <br />
<br />
To the north of a cold, soaking rain this system spreads through parts of 
the Northeast and 
mid-Atlantic, a rain/snow mix or changeover to snow is expected. Where
exactly this occurs will depend on the storm's track.<br />
<br />
As it stands, areas from the eastern Great Lakes into the 
Appalachians will run the best chance 
for snow. A chance for a mix of rain and snow is already in the forecast for
places like Buffalo, Binghampton and 
Syracuse, N.Y., as well as 
Burlington, Vt.<br />
<p> </p>


<p>
</p><p><br />
Further south, outbreaks of thunderstorms will unleash downpours, some heavy
enough to spark flooding. This in a corridor  that has seen at
least two-times the normal rainfall since the start of September.The primary suite of medium-range models (GFS, ECMWF, GEM) have suggested that in parts of Georgia we will have to monitor potential for some flooding, some severe weather and at the tail end of the event MAYBE an early frost or freeze and maybe just maybe some curiosity flurries as the seasons first Nor 'Easter brings winter from the Great Lakes region to New England and then sends a sliver South into the heart of Dixie or the Southeast. As always I remind you the models are simulations not the real weather and even if they all agree they can all be wrong, and the devil is in the details and I will take care of that on a daily basis on the radio.</p><p>Leaving America, An outbreak of cold more fitting of December than October will knife southward
out of Scandinavia into the heart of central and eastern Europe early this
week. Rain and snow  from Germany and
Poland south into the middle of the Balkan Peninsula. Significant snowfall will
keep mostly to hilly peeks and, especially, to the mountains such as the
Carpathian, Alps and Balkan highlands. Locally, there will be heavy mountain
snow. 
</p>

<p>
</p><p><br />
Soaking rain will break out near the Adriatic Sea on Monday, then will shift
east to Romania, Bulgaria and western Ukraine by mid week. </p>


<p>
</p><br />
The stormy weather could disrupt ground travel. Delays and cancellations of
flights to and from destinations in central and western Europe.<p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /> </p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/weather-headlines-in-the-news.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/weather-headlines-in-the-news.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate change</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">extreme weather</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">flooding</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">greenhouse effect</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">major storm</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">record cold</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">record heat</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">snow</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Weather News headlines</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:47:15 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>More winter outlooks look the same</title>
            <description><![CDATA[It is interesting to note that since I issued my preliminary winter forecast a host of other sources have come out with their winter outlooks and they all look at least similar. From Southern Nevada to Idaho record early snows have fallen already and more snow storms are on the way for the Mountain West and into the Northern Plains and upper Midwest.<br /><br />The Commodity Weather Group is calling for the coldest winter in a decade in much of the East and South U.S. Both the Farmers Almanac and The Old Farmers Almanac are calling for quite a winter. A couple forecasters at Accu-Weather are calling for cold and above-normal snow in the East and South. A private forecaster formerly at the Weather Channel and ABC News Joe D'Aleo is calling for a cold winter for much of the country. Weather Services International is calling for colder than normal weather in the Southeast USA October through December.&nbsp; Both the European and American long-range climate models are pointing in the same direction for the Fall and Winter. Much of this is based on the El Nino condition being on the weak side which correlates with a 70-75% chance of below-normal winter temps East of the Mississippi River. Of course this is only one factor and it as well as the other signals we look at could change over the next couple months, if so the long-range forecast for winter will also have to change.<br /><br />Natural gas prices should withstand below-normal winter temps  as record high inventories are expected at least this month and maybe through December or longer.<br /><br />However, I am a little concerned that most forecasters agree. This is unusual so I hope we're not all being fooled. My final forecast call will come out no later than the start of December. m<br /> ]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/more-winter-outlooks-look-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/10/more-winter-outlooks-look-the.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate change</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">extreme weather</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">greenhouse</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long-range forecasting</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">news</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter outlook</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:38:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Preliminary winter outlook for Georgia and the nation</title>
            <description><![CDATA[The complete First Estimate of the coming winter complete with graphics can be found here, with a look back at the summer and ahead to winter 2009-2010. <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-4648-Atlanta-Weather-Examiner">Click here for Winter</a> <div><br /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/09/preliminary-winter-outlook-for-1.html</link>
            <guid>http://wsbradio.com/blogs/kirk_mellishs_weather_commentary/2009/09/preliminary-winter-outlook-for-1.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate change</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">el nino</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">greenhouse effect</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">la nina</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">long range forecast</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">solar cycles</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sun spots</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">winter outlook</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:15:35 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
