Report Abuse

You have chosen to report the following comment as abusive, offensive, or inappropriate.

Interesting how the tides have changed. Were the depth of questions asked in the debate necessary? For those who vote according to one political side, no. No questions are ever necessary for those who have made up their mind. But, for those who feel that character and the ability to make good choices play an essential importance in the presidency these questions are necessary. Sure, they seem harsh, even divisive. On the main issues these two candidates hardly differ. You have to ask these questions to show their difference. You don't elect people who have ties to mob bosses or terrorists. Similarly, you don't elect people who have friendly relationships with America haters and those with a background of illegal activity. We tell our kids to make good choices. We tell them to choose their friends wisely. If you go into a corner store with your friend and he steals an item, you will be looked at as a thief, as well or possibly not welcome in the store ever again. Do you elect someone who creates a story for personal gain? What does it say about you when you talk to people and they walk away from it saying 'She may be exaggerating a bit' or 'She's only saying that to get attention'. Character is so important and cannot be overlooked. Hard questions over trivial points of interest are inevitable. If you can't eat the small fry, how are you supposed to handle the whole potato.
By Rightistblogger

Your name
Explanation
Security Code	* Please enter the code shown above