In an extraordinary about face, the Justice Department has moved to dismiss a criminal case brought against President Donald Trump's first National Security Adviser, saying that Michael Flynn's statements - while they were false to FBI agents - were not materially related to the investigation of Flynn.
"Based on a careful assessment of the balance of proof, the equities, and the federal interest served by continued prosecution of false statements that were not “material” to any bona fide investigation, the Government has concluded that the evidence is insufficient to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt," the new motion stated.
The 20 page submission to a federal judge on Thursday was made by the acting U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C., Timothy Shea, but not by any of the federal prosecutors who had handled the Flynn case.
Shortly before the motion to dismiss was formally put on the Flynn docket, prosecutor Brandon Van Grack gave official notice to the court that he was withdrawing from the Justice Department legal team handling Flynn's prosecution.
Any move to drop the charges would still have to be approved by the U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who has twice given Flynn more time to consider his original guilty plea before sentencing.
This is remarkable: DOJ says it now doesn't think it can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Flynn lied to the FBI, even though he *twice* admitted in open court that he did, and those admissions could be used as evidence against him. pic.twitter.com/0YxZuFwXnc
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) May 7, 2020
At the Justice Department, spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said the Flynn case had been reviewed by Jeff Jensen, a federal prosecutor in Missouri.
“Through the course of my review of General Flynn’s case, I concluded the proper and just course was to dismiss the case," Jensen said in a statement.
"I briefed Attorney General Barr on my findings, advised him on these conclusions, and he agreed," Jensen added.
The move drew sharp attacks from critics of the President.
"Attorney General Barr has consistently acted for the personal and political benefit of President Trump, rather than fulfilling his duty as chief law enforcement officer of the United States," said Noah Bookbinder, the head of the ethics watch dog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
"AG Barr’s politicization is destroying the credibility of the Department," said Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA).
At the White House, the President said it was the right choice.
"He was an innocent man," President Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "Now in my book he’s an even greater warrior.”
That was a different tune from what Mr. Trump said in December of 2017, when Flynn plead guilty to lying about his contacts with the Russian Ambassador, during the transition period between President Trump's victory, and taking the oath of office.
President Trump said he was ‘very happy’ after the Justice Department abruptly sought to drop criminal charges against his former national security adviser Michael Flynn https://t.co/GbBjrSZiPK pic.twitter.com/m18Me4KqSj
— Reuters (@Reuters) May 7, 2020
I had to fire General Flynn because he lied to the Vice President and the FBI. He has pled guilty to those lies. It is a shame because his actions during the transition were lawful. There was nothing to hide!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 2, 2017
The dispute stems from a January 24, 2017 interview with Flynn at the White House, in which FBI agents asked whether Flynn had urged the Russian Ambassador to the U.S. to not respond to sanctions levied by the Obama Administration over election interference in 2016.
"During the interview, FLYNN falsely stated that he did not ask Russia's Ambassador to the United States ("Russian Ambassador") to refrain from escalating the situation in response to sanctions that the United States had imposed against Russia," the plea bargain states, which Flynn agreed to.
Flynn was later fired from his post as National Security Adviser for lying about the matter to Vice President Mike Pence.